Abstract 594P
Background
Liquid biopsy studies have shown the change of RAS status in ctDNA after chemotherapy in RAS wild-type mCRC. Our prospective observational study (RASMEX study) showed that the rate of RAS mutant mCRC patients (pts) with RAS mutations (mts) negative in ctDNA after standard chemotherapy was 22.8% (Izawa, et al, JSMO annual meeting 2023). Here, we present the efficacy of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapy for these pts.
Methods
RAS mutant mCRC pts with refractory or intolerable after response to prior fluoropyrimidine-containing regimen were enrolled. OncoBEAMTM RAS CRC kit was used to measure RAS mts in ctDNA just after 1st- or 2nd-line treatment. For pts with RAS mts negative in ctDNA who received anti-EGFR therapy after enrollment, the overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and progression-free survival (PFS) were prospectively evaluated. In RAS mts negative pts in ctDNA, blood samples were also collected before anti-EGFR therapy and RAS/BRAF/PIK3CA mts were measured by Plasma-SeqSensei TM CRC RUO Kit.
Results
Of 55 (22.8%) had RAS mts negative in ctDNA among 241 pts who filled the eligibility criteria, 29 received chemotherapy including anti-EGFR antibody: median age, 66 years; left-sided primary tumor, 79.3%; 11 pts for 2nd-line setting and 18 pts for 3rd- or later-line setting. In 11 pts receiving 2nd-line combination chemotherapy, ORR and DCR were 0% and 54.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 25.1–84.0), respectively. The median PFS was 4.9 months (95%CI: 1.9–6.5). In 8 pts without any mts in ctDNA before treatment, DCR was 62.5% and median PFS was 5.6 months. While, ORR and DCR were 5.6% (95%CI: 0–16.1) and 55.6% (95%CI: 32.6–78.5), respectively, in 18 pts receiving 3rd- or later-line treatment with combo- or monotherapy. The median PFS was 3.3 months (95%CI: 1.6–4.8). In 12 pts without any mts in ctDNA before treatment, ORR and DCR both were better (8.3% and 58.3%, respectively).
Conclusions
Our prospective observational study revealed the efficacy of anti-EGFR therapy for RAS mutant mCRC pts with RAS mts negative in ctDNA after 1st- or 2nd-line treatment. Further prospective studies need to be conducted for these pts.
Clinical trial identification
UMIN000043442.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Japan Clinical Cancer Research Organization.
Funding
Sysmex.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
622P - Evaluation of the metastatic colorectal cancer score (mCCS) in predicting outcome for patients with RAS wild type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with first-line (1L) panitumumab (PAN) plus FOLFIRI/FOLFOX: Updated interim results of the non-interventional study VALIDATE
Presenter: Marcel Reiser
Session: Poster session 10
623P - VIC regimen (vemurafenib/irinotecan/cetuximab) versus bevacizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for BRAF V600E-mutated advanced colorectal cancer
Presenter: Yijiao Chen
Session: Poster session 10
624P - Tolerability and safety of vemurafenib, cetuximab combined with camrelizumab for BRAF V600E-mutated /MSS metastatic colorectal cancer
Presenter: Meng Qiu
Session: Poster session 10
625P - Efficacy and safety of the combination of encorafenib and cetuximab in patients with BRAF V600E mutated metastatic colorectal cancer: An AGEO real-world multicentre study
Presenter: Claire Gallois
Session: Poster session 10
626P - Mucinous differentiation (MD) as predictor of response in BRAF-V600E mutated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi) combinations
Presenter: Francisco Javier Ros Montana
Session: Poster session 10