Abstract 591P
Background
The utility of ctDNA analysis in guiding personalized ACT for resectable CRM remains unclear.
Methods
Patients (pts) with previously untreated resectable CRM scheduled for curative resection were prospectively enrolled between March 2021 and October 2022. Pretreatment genomic alterations were detected using Guardant360, a 74-gene ctDNA profiling assay, while postoperative 4-week MRD was assessed using Guardant Reveal, a methylation-based ctDNA MRD assay.
Results
Of 118 eligible pts enrolled, pretreatment ctDNA was detected in 99 pts (84%), 62 (53%) of whom had poor genomic profile, predetermined to have at least one of BRAF, RAS, PIK3CA, or SMAD4 mutations. Of 110 pts who underwent surgery for CRM, postoperative 4-week MRD was detected in 26 (22%) pts. Eighteen patients (16%) had both pretreatment poor genomic profile and positive MRD. With a median follow-up time of 11.0 months (m), median recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 15.2 m. Poor genomic profile (hazard ratio [HR], 2.26 [95% CI, 1.00–5.10]) and MRD positivity (HR, 3.85 [95% CI, 1.79–8.30]) were significantly associated with shorter RFS in multivariate analysis. Positive MRD was associated with shorter RFS (HR, 5.04 [95% CI, 2.30–11.05]) in the poor genomic profile group but not in those without poor genomic profile. Patients with poor genomic profile and positive MRD derived significant benefit from ACT (median RFS, 8.0 m vs. 2.0 m; HR, 0.25 [95% CI, 0.07–0.82]), while no significant benefit was observed in other groups.
Conclusions
Pretreatment genomic profile and postoperative MRD by ctDNA analysis accurately stratify the prognosis and may guide personalized ACT in pts with resectable CRM.
Clinical trial identification
UMIN000042490.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
The Japan Agency for Medical Research and development.
Disclosure
E. Oki: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Taiho Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Bayer, Eli Lilly, Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD; Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Research Grant: Guardant Health. Y. Nakamura: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Chugai, Merck Biopharma, Guardant Health AMEA; Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: Taiho, Chugai, Guardant Health, Genomedia, Daiichi Sankyo, Roche Diagnostics; Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: Seagen. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
622P - Evaluation of the metastatic colorectal cancer score (mCCS) in predicting outcome for patients with RAS wild type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with first-line (1L) panitumumab (PAN) plus FOLFIRI/FOLFOX: Updated interim results of the non-interventional study VALIDATE
Presenter: Marcel Reiser
Session: Poster session 10
623P - VIC regimen (vemurafenib/irinotecan/cetuximab) versus bevacizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for BRAF V600E-mutated advanced colorectal cancer
Presenter: Yijiao Chen
Session: Poster session 10
624P - Tolerability and safety of vemurafenib, cetuximab combined with camrelizumab for BRAF V600E-mutated /MSS metastatic colorectal cancer
Presenter: Meng Qiu
Session: Poster session 10
625P - Efficacy and safety of the combination of encorafenib and cetuximab in patients with BRAF V600E mutated metastatic colorectal cancer: An AGEO real-world multicentre study
Presenter: Claire Gallois
Session: Poster session 10
626P - Mucinous differentiation (MD) as predictor of response in BRAF-V600E mutated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi) combinations
Presenter: Francisco Javier Ros Montana
Session: Poster session 10