Abstract 798P
Background
To date, there is no consensus on the FIGO recommendations for NMGCC in which chemotherapy (CTX) should be initiated after diagnosis in these patients. Therefore, we conducted the first study involving a large sample of patients with NMGCC to evaluate the effect of chemotherapy on overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in patients with NMGCC.
Methods
Data were obtained from the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2000 and 2019. Patients who met any of the following criteria were excluded: diagnosis not confirmed by histology; not the first tumor or other malignancies in the body; not arising from the placenta; unknown data; or metastatic status. Chi-square tests were used to compare clinicopathological features, while survival rates and prognostic factors were identified using the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazard regression.
Results
The study population comprised 526 patients. Among them 128 patients with “Surgery,” 127 patients with “CTX” and 261 patients with “Surgery + CTX”. Most patients (55.3%) were aged 30 years or older, with a median age of 32 years. The largest racial group was white (63.5%; n=334). A total of 54.4% of the patients had a tumor size greater than 4 cm, with a median tumor size of 4.2 cm. Most cases were localized (71.5%, n=376). “Surgery + CTX” had the most favorable survival outcome with a 5-year OS of 96.6%, followed by “Surgery” (95.9%) and then “CTX” (93%). No significant differences were found in OS or CSS between the groups (P<0.33 and P<0.57, respectively). Older age was a poor prognostic factor for the OS and CSS. Multivariable analysis confirmed that there was no statistically significant difference between the effect of all therapeutic groups on OS and CSS, “Surgery + CTX” (HR=0.7, 95%CI:0.28-1.8 and HR=0.65, 95%CI:0.2-2, respectively).
Conclusions
The results of this study showed that CTX did not affect OS or CSS in patients with NMGCC. Multicenter prospective studies are needed to validate and build upon these findings; however, our results provide a starting point for a better understanding of these rare cancers.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
812P - Mental and socioeconomic burden in co-parents and children of patients with endometrial and cervical cancer: A Swedish population-based study
Presenter: Karin Sundström
Session: Poster session 11
814P - Clinical significance of isolated pulmonary recurrence in patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer who achieved complete remission after primary treatment
Presenter: Jigeun Yoo
Session: Poster session 11
815P - Clinical outcome of metastatic endometrial carcinoma patients treated with chemotherapy: ENDOVIE, a GINECO national observational cohort study
Presenter: Jerome Alexandre
Session: Poster session 11
816P - Laparoscopic versus open-surgery in FIGO stage II endometrioid endometrium cancers: Is there a prognostic effect?
Presenter: Alain Zeimet
Session: Poster session 11
817P - A systematic review of recruitment of ethnic minorities to RCTs of systemic anti-cancer therapies in gynaecological cancers
Presenter: Luke Steventon
Session: Poster session 11