Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 25

CN21 - Stakeholder perceptions of cervical screening accessibility and attendance in Ireland: A qualitative study

Date

21 Oct 2023

Session

Poster session 25

Topics

Secondary Prevention/Screening

Tumour Site

Cervical Cancer

Presenters

Sophie Mulcahy Symmons

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2023) 34 (suppl_2): S1229-S1256. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1321

Authors

S. Mulcahy Symmons1, A. Drury2, A. De Brún1

Author affiliations

  • 1 School Of Nusing, Midwifery And Health Systems, University College Dublin, D04 V1W8 - Dublin/IE
  • 2 School Of Nursing, Psychotherapy And Community Health, Dublin City University, D09 V209 - Dublin/IE

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract CN21

Background

Screening plays a key role in preventing incidence of cervical cancer. In Ireland, the incidence and screening participation rates are not evenly distributed across the population, and evidence is limited. To provide and equitable service, it is important to understand who is and is not attending screening and why. This study explored the perceptions of expert stakeholders on cervical cancer screening attendance and accessibility in Ireland.

Methods

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 healthcare professionals, policymakers and academics to explore their expert views on cervical screening accessibility and attendance in Ireland. Interviews were conducted online in 2022. Reflexive thematic analysis was used inductively to generate themes, supported by NVivo.

Results

Three themes were developed from the interview data: Getting the right information out the right way, Acceptability and accessibility of screening, and trying to identify and reach the non-attenders. Participants felt public knowledge of cervical screening and Human Papilloma Virus was low and the communication of this information needed to align better with sources that women engage with. Accessibility and acceptability of screening was thought to be dependent on individual, cultural and structural and service factors. Identifying and reaching non-attenders was considered important by participants but community outreach and public engagement could enhance understanding and address the challenges of non-attendance.

Conclusions

Nurses have a significant opportunity to support uptake and engagement with screening. Nurses are often the first point of contact to provide information regarding health promotion and are therefore well positioned to provide education and support which can address the barriers to screening engagement. Community engagement could support understanding of the distribution of participation and awareness of screening and enhance supports for women to make informed decisions about engagement with cervical screening.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Irish Cancer Society.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.