Abstract 780P
Background
In high-grade ovarian cancer (OC) TCGA found BRCA1meth inferior to BRCAmut regarding prognosis probably due to lower sensitivity to platinum (Pt++)-based chemotherapy.
Methods
In 143 high-grade OCs tested for BRCA mutations, additionally BRCA DNA methylation was determined using MethyLight PCR and genome-wide LOH and Aneuploidy Normalized Telemetric imbalance (ANTI) by means of SNP-Array analysis (GSA-24 v 3.0/Illumina) as surrogates of genome-wide DNA-scarring. For LOH and ANTI a “clinical-threshold” was calculated by Pt++-response, determined at the first recurrence. Both were integrated in a common HRD-Score (cut-off: ≥1.912 for HRD positivity).
Results
In the present cohort, BRCA1 DNA methylation (meBRCA1) was detected in 15 (10%) and mostly BRCAwt OCs (n=14, 17%). Only one BRCA1mut OC had concomitant meBRCA1. BRCA2 DNA methylation was not observed. In terms of genomic scars, meBRCAwt and BRCAmut OCs had similar HRD scores, which were higher than those in unmethylated BRCAwt OCs (p<0.003). In BRCAwt OCs, BRCA1 methylation levels (PMR-values) were higher in HRD pos. than in HRD negative OCs (p<0.001). Progression free survival (PFS) of patients with meBRCA1 OCs was noninferior to that of BRCAmut OC patients. Worst PFS and OS was found in the subgroup of unmethylated BRCAwt OCs compared to patients with BRCAmut and meBRCA1 OCs in univariate (p=0.003; p=0.022) and multivariate survival analysis (p=0.006, p=0.018). All but one of the cancers classified as Pt++-refractory or -resistant at first relapse (92%) were unmethylated BRCAwt OCs. None of the meBRCA1 cancers were rated Pt++-refractory or -resistant, and only one BRCAmut OCs was associated with a Pt++-resistant first relapse. 98.6% of the recurrences originating from OCs with genetically or epigenetically altered BRCA genes were Pt++-sensitive, of which 77% were considered highly sensitive.
Conclusions
High-grade OCs without genetic or epigenetic BRCA alterations exhibit worst PFS. Based on genome-wide scarring, BRCA1 promotor methylation seems to exert an equivalent detrimental effect on the DNA repair by homologous recombination as pathogenic BRCA mutations.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
812P - Mental and socioeconomic burden in co-parents and children of patients with endometrial and cervical cancer: A Swedish population-based study
Presenter: Karin Sundström
Session: Poster session 11
814P - Clinical significance of isolated pulmonary recurrence in patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer who achieved complete remission after primary treatment
Presenter: Jigeun Yoo
Session: Poster session 11
815P - Clinical outcome of metastatic endometrial carcinoma patients treated with chemotherapy: ENDOVIE, a GINECO national observational cohort study
Presenter: Jerome Alexandre
Session: Poster session 11
816P - Laparoscopic versus open-surgery in FIGO stage II endometrioid endometrium cancers: Is there a prognostic effect?
Presenter: Alain Zeimet
Session: Poster session 11
817P - A systematic review of recruitment of ethnic minorities to RCTs of systemic anti-cancer therapies in gynaecological cancers
Presenter: Luke Steventon
Session: Poster session 11