Abstract 991P
Background
Although Trans-Arterial Chemoembolization (TACE) is the most common procedure for the treatment of intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), scarce data have demonstrated the superiority of this approach over bland embolization (TAE). In this study we aimed to compare the effectiveness and liver-related complications of these two procedures through a propensity score matching (PSM) analysis.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed a cohort of patients with intermediate stage HCC treated with first-line TAE (using Lipiodol) or TACE (using either drug-eluting beads or a chemotherapy-lipiodol emulsion) in three referral centers in San José, Costa Rica, between 2019 and 2021. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included time to systemic treatment, time to liver transplantation, and liver-related complications. A Cox proportional hazard model was used to identify predictors for OS after adjustment using a PSM (1:1 greedy nearest-neighbour matching).
Results
A total of 114 patients were analyzed, with 73 and 41 of them receiving TACE or TAE, respectively. All included patients had diagnosis of advanced chronic liver disease with a Child-Pugh score A in 72.8% of cases. After a median follow-up time of 15.8 months and PSM adjustment, no difference in terms of OS (Hazard Ratio: 1.25; 95% Confidence Interval 95%: 0.69 – 2.23; p = 0.45), time to systemic treatment (HR: 1.52; 95%CI: 0.52 – 4.41; p = 0.44), and transplantation-free survival (HR: 0.34; 95%CI: 0.22 – 2.84; p = 0.30) was observed between patients receiving TACE or TAE. After multivariate analysis only the Child-Pugh score was independently associated to OS (Table). The frequency of liver-related complications was similar among both groups (5 vs 7.5%; p=0.17). Table: 991P
Multivariate analysis for Overall Survival after PSM adjustement
Variable | Hazard ratio (95% Confidence Interval) | p value |
Sex (female vs male) | 0.95 (0.49-1.84) | 0.876 |
ECOG performance status (0-1 vs 2) | 0.52 (0.18-1.55) | 0.235 |
Child-Pugh score (A vs B) | 0.32 (0.15-0.66) | 0.002* |
Type of treatment (TACE vs TAE) | 1.68 (0.84-3.33) | 0.138 |
* Statistically significant at p<0.05
Conclusions
TAE and TACE provide similar long-term outcomes and liver-related complications in patients with intermediate HCC.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
946P - Sintilimab plus lenvatinib as conversion therapy in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A prospective, non-randomized, open-label, phase II, expansion cohort study
Presenter: Shichun Lu
Session: Poster session 18
947P - The efficacy and safety of cadonilimab combined with lenvatinib for first-line treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A phase Ib/II clinical trial
Presenter: Li Bai
Session: Poster session 18
949P - Regorafenib combined with immunotherapy versus regorafenib as second-line therapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A multicenter real-world study
Presenter: Bin-Kui Li
Session: Poster session 18
952P - Efficacy and safety of a PRospective, Observational trial of Lenvatinib cOmbined with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) as initial treatment for advaNced staGe hepatocellular carcinoma (PROLONG): A multicenter, single-armed, real-world study
Presenter: Guoliang Shao
Session: Poster session 18
953P - Tislelizumab plus regorafenib as second-line therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC): A single-arm, phase II trial
Presenter: Zhongchao Li
Session: Poster session 18
954P - Radiotherapy combined with tislelizumab plus anlotinib as first-line treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma: A single arm, phase II clinical trial
Presenter: Guishu wu
Session: Poster session 18
955P - IMMUNIB trial (AIO-HEP-0218/ass): A single-arm phase II study evaluating safety and efficacy of immunotherapy with nivolumab in combination with lenvatinib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
Presenter: Arndt Vogel
Session: Poster session 18