Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 18

991P - Real-world comparison of trans-arterial chemoembolization and bland embolization for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: A propensity score analysis

Date

21 Oct 2023

Session

Poster session 18

Topics

Therapy

Tumour Site

Hepatobiliary Cancers

Presenters

Allan Ramos-Esquivel

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2023) 34 (suppl_2): S594-S618. 10.1016/S0923-7534(23)01939-7

Authors

A. Ramos-Esquivel1, B. Solis2, W. Araya2, J.A. Castro-Cordero3, C.M. Umaña1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology Dept., Hospital San Juan de Dios - Caja Costarricense de Seguro Social, 10107 - San José/CR
  • 2 Radiology Department, Hospital San Juan de Dios - Caja Costarricense de Seguro Social, 10107 - San José/CR
  • 3 Medicine Department, Hospital Mexico CCSS, 10107 - San Jose/CR

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 991P

Background

Although Trans-Arterial Chemoembolization (TACE) is the most common procedure for the treatment of intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), scarce data have demonstrated the superiority of this approach over bland embolization (TAE). In this study we aimed to compare the effectiveness and liver-related complications of these two procedures through a propensity score matching (PSM) analysis.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed a cohort of patients with intermediate stage HCC treated with first-line TAE (using Lipiodol) or TACE (using either drug-eluting beads or a chemotherapy-lipiodol emulsion) in three referral centers in San José, Costa Rica, between 2019 and 2021. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included time to systemic treatment, time to liver transplantation, and liver-related complications. A Cox proportional hazard model was used to identify predictors for OS after adjustment using a PSM (1:1 greedy nearest-neighbour matching).

Results

A total of 114 patients were analyzed, with 73 and 41 of them receiving TACE or TAE, respectively. All included patients had diagnosis of advanced chronic liver disease with a Child-Pugh score A in 72.8% of cases. After a median follow-up time of 15.8 months and PSM adjustment, no difference in terms of OS (Hazard Ratio: 1.25; 95% Confidence Interval 95%: 0.69 – 2.23; p = 0.45), time to systemic treatment (HR: 1.52; 95%CI: 0.52 – 4.41; p = 0.44), and transplantation-free survival (HR: 0.34; 95%CI: 0.22 – 2.84; p = 0.30) was observed between patients receiving TACE or TAE. After multivariate analysis only the Child-Pugh score was independently associated to OS (Table). The frequency of liver-related complications was similar among both groups (5 vs 7.5%; p=0.17). Table: 991P

Multivariate analysis for Overall Survival after PSM adjustement

Variable Hazard ratio (95% Confidence Interval) p value
Sex (female vs male) 0.95 (0.49-1.84) 0.876
ECOG performance status (0-1 vs 2) 0.52 (0.18-1.55) 0.235
Child-Pugh score (A vs B) 0.32 (0.15-0.66) 0.002*
Type of treatment (TACE vs TAE) 1.68 (0.84-3.33) 0.138

* Statistically significant at p<0.05

Conclusions

TAE and TACE provide similar long-term outcomes and liver-related complications in patients with intermediate HCC.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.