Abstract 456P
Background
RIGHT Choice showed a statistically significant median progression-free survival benefit of ≈1 yr with first-line RIB + ET vs combo CT (HR, 0.54; P=0.0007) in patients (pts) with aggressive HR+/HER2− ABC. As QOL data provide information on real-life treatment (tx) benefit as well as impact tx choice and duration, a QOL analysis was performed.
Methods
Pre/perimenopausal pts with no prior systemic therapy for aggressive HR+/HER2− ABC were randomized 1:1 to RIB + ET or combo CT. The FACT-B scores were determined by a questionnaire administered at protocol-defined time points. The median time to deterioration (mTTD) in overall health status, nausea or pain was defined as a composite endpoint of time from randomization to either first occurrence of ≥10% deterioration in FACT-B scores with no later improvement or date of discontinuation due to progressive disease, death, or adverse events. Only pts with baseline and at least one post-baseline pt reported outcome assessment were included. Pts without events were censored at the last evaluation prior to the earliest of cutoff date, end of tx, start of new tx, or when lost to follow-up, or at consent withdrawal. Descriptive summary of change from baseline in FACT-B total score was also summarized.
Results
The composite endpoint of mTTD in overall health status was delayed with RIB + ET (N=111) vs combo CT (N=96;16.8 vs 10.6 mo; HR, 0.63; Table). The mTTD in subdomains of nausea (18.4 vs 10.4 mo; HR, 0.56) and pain (13.0 vs 10.4 mo; HR, 0.70) was also delayed in pts on RIB + ET vs combo CT. A numerical trend in change from baseline in FACT-B total scores during tx favoring RIB + ET over combo CT was observed.
Conclusions
This analysis suggests that first-line RIB + ET is associated with better QOL than combo CT for pts with aggressive HR+/HER2– ABC, providing supportive evidence for RIB + ET use in this pt population. Table: 456P
End Points | Outcomes | RIB + ET (N=111) | Combo CT (N=96) |
TTD in overall health status | Deterioration events, n FACT-B score decrease, n1/n (%)Tx discontinuation, n2/n (%) | 6724/67 (35.8)43/67 (64.2) | 6622/66 (33.3)44/66 (66.7) |
mTTD, mo | 16.8 | 10.6 | |
HR; 95% CI | 0.63; 0.44-0.90 | ||
TTD in nausea | Deterioration events, n FACT-B score decrease, n1/n (%)Tx discontinuation, n2/n (%) | 6729/67 (43.2)38/67 (56.7) | 6930/69 (43.5)39/69 (56.5) |
mTTD, mo | 18.4 | 10.4 | |
HR; 95% CI | 0.56; 0.39-0.79 | ||
TTD in pain | Deterioration events, n FACT-B score decrease, n1/n (%)Tx discontinuation, n2/n (%) | 7234/72 (47.2)38/72 (52.8) | 6522/65 (33.8)43/65 (66.2) |
mTTD, mo | 13.0 | 10.4 | |
HR; 95% CI | 0.70; 0.49-0.99 |
Clinical trial identification
NCT03839823.
Editorial acknowledgement
Editorial assistance in the writing of the abstract was provided by Shashank Tandon of MediTech Media.
Legal entity responsible for the study
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation.
Funding
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation.
Disclosure
Y. Eralp: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Novartis, Merck, Sharp and Dohme, AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Educational fee: Gilead, Glaxo Smith Kline; Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Research Grant: Roche; Non-Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Other, Non-compansated educational program: Roche, Novartis; Non-Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Other, Non-compensated mentorship program: Boston Scientific; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Satellite meeting fee: Roche. S. Im: Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Research Grant: AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Eisai, Roche, Daewoong Pharm, Boryung Pharm, Daiichi Sankyo; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, Novartis, Hanmi, Pfizer, Eisai, Roche, Lilly, GSK, MSD , Daiichi Sankyo, Idience, Bertis. Y. Lu: Other, Personal and Institutional, Other, clinical trial study fee: Novartis ; Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Research Grant: Novartis; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Novartis, Daiichi Sankyo; Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Invited Speaker: Novartis, Roche, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, Eisai, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Daiichi Sankyo; Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor, Consultation fee: Pfizer; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Contracted research: Roche, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer; Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Other, clinical trial: AstraZeneca. Y.S. Yap: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Honoraria: Novartis, Pfizer, Lilly/DKSH , Eisai, AstraZeneca, MSD, Inivata, Specialised Therapeutics, Roche; Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel support: Lilly/DKSH ; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel support: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Research Grant: MSD. H.A. Azim: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, honoraria for advisory boards and lecturing: Novartis, Roche, Pfizer, MSD, BMS, ASZ, Lilly; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker, honoraria for advisory boards and lecturing: Novartis, Roche, Pfizer, MSD, BMS, ASZ, Lilly; Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Other, non financial support for supporting some educational activities for my in academic institution: Novartis, Roche, Pfizer, MSD, BMS, ASZ, Lilly. H. Hu, T. Delgar Alfaro, J. Wu, M. Gao: Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Full or part-time Employment: Novartis; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Novartis. N.S. El Saghir: Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Invited Speaker, Honoraria: AstraZeneca, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Roche; Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Advisory Board, Honoraria: AstraZeneca, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Roche. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
457P - Disparities in receipt of CDK4/6 inhibitors with endocrine therapy as therapy for hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer in the real-world setting
Presenter: Gretchen Kimmick
Session: Poster session 04
458P - Metastatic breast cancer: How and how often do we communicate? Results from an Italian national survey
Presenter: Camilla Lisanti
Session: Poster session 04
460P - Impact of fulvestrant utilization on prognostic outcome among patients with HR+ve/HER2-ve metastatic breast cancer: Results from a real-world dataset
Presenter: Shaheenah Dawood
Session: Poster session 04
462P - Health outcomes of treatment sequences with eribulin or other single agents’ chemotherapy for treating relapsed metastatic HER2-negative breast cancer
Presenter: Simone Rivolo
Session: Poster session 04
463P - Impact of two waves of Sars-Cov-2 outbreak on the clinical presentation and outcomes of newly referred breast cancer cases at AP-HP: A retrospective multicenter cohort study
Presenter: Sonia Priou
Session: Poster session 04
464P - Developing a prognostic risk stratification model and treatment options for HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastasis
Presenter: JiaXin Chen
Session: Poster session 04
465P - Reporting of older subgroups enrolled to registration breast cancer trials, 2012-2021
Presenter: Colm Mac Eochagain
Session: Poster session 04
466P - Integrated analysis of potential prognosis and differential expression between primary and metastatic foci for COL12A1 in breast cancer
Presenter: Lei Tang
Session: Poster session 04