Abstract 1851P
Background
We have previously reported on the initial results of the prospective longitudinal PICO-SM study (Lim et al. 2023), highlighting the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the lives of patients with colorectal cancer. Herein, we present the psychological impact of the third wave of the pandemic to patients, when the Omicron variant became prevalent (December 2021 to early 2022).
Methods
Patients were invited to participate in cohort II of the PICO-SM study by completing a questionnaire, including screening psychometric tools. Multivariate analysis was performed using logistic regression for binary outcomes: anxiety (GAD-7 score ≥ 5), depression (PHQ-9 score ≥ 10), and poor well-being (WHO-5 < 50); and odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated.
Results
In total, 96 participants were included: mean age 64 years, 64% (n = 61) males. 33% (n = 32/96) reported poor well-being (WHO-5 < 50), 27% (n = 26/96) anxiety (GAD-7 ≥ 5), 11% (n = 11/96) depressive symptoms (PHQ-9 ≥ 10) and 3% (n = 3/96) probable post-traumatic stress disorder (PC-PTSD-5 ≥ 4). The results compare with distress levels in the second pandemic wave: 31%, 24%, 15% and 3%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that patients who had investigations cancelled (OR 9.22, 95% CI 1.09-77.85; p = 0.041) or felt that the pandemic would affect their mental health (OR 3.82, 95% CI 1.96-7.44; p < 0.001) had increased risk of anxiety. Similarly, concern that the pandemic would affect their cancer treatment (OR 4.59, 95% CI 1.03-20.56; p = 0.046) or would affect their mental health (OR 3.90, 95% CI 1.38-11.03; p = 0.010) were found independent predictors of poor wellbeing.
Conclusions
The psychological distress experienced by patients, particularly anxiety, remained persistently high during the third wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. These updated results align with our initial findings, emphasizing the critical importance of continuing cancer treatment amidst the ongoing humanitarian emergency. It is crucial for healthcare services to prioritize ongoing psychological support for cancer patients, with a particular focus on those who are more vulnerable.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Servier.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1867P - A cross-sectional examination of information disclosure and health literacy amongst patients with lymphoma
Presenter: Steve Kalloger
Session: Poster session 05
1868P - Challenges for shared decision making in incurable cancer, with a focus on health literacy
Presenter: Chloe Holden
Session: Poster session 05
1871P - The PainRELife ecosystem: A new aid for improving clinical care and shared decision-making in breast cancer patients with chronic pain
Presenter: Marianna Masiero
Session: Poster session 05
1872P - Financial distress of a cancer disease in Germany: A new patient reported outcome measure (PROM) and first results from a bi-centered cross-sectional analysis
Presenter: Sophie Pauge
Session: Poster session 05
1873P - Patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms and self-care behaviours: Preliminary data of a cross-sectional study
Presenter: Valentina Biagioli
Session: Poster session 05
1874P - Beliefs about chemotherapy in Tunisian patients newly diagnosed with cancer
Presenter: Hadhemi Ayadi
Session: Poster session 05
1875P - Behind the use of ChatGPT for oncological purposes: Fears and challenges
Presenter: Ilaria Durosini
Session: Poster session 05
1876P - Cancer stigma: How Tunisian patients perceive their cancer
Presenter: sofiene Fendri
Session: Poster session 05
1877P - Meaning-making in the re-entry phase: A qualitative focus group study with patients with breast cancer and melanoma
Presenter: Anna Visser
Session: Poster session 05