Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 04

1295P - Prospective trial of immuno-(chemo)therapy prior to resection, definitive chemo-radiotherapy, or palliative therapy in patients with borderline resectable or oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer (KOMPASSneo)

Date

21 Oct 2023

Session

Poster session 04

Topics

Immunotherapy

Tumour Site

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Presenters

Martin Faehling

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2023) 34 (suppl_2): S746-S754. 10.1016/S0923-7534(23)01266-8

Authors

M. Faehling1, K. Lehrach2, S. Fallscheer1, B. Schwenk1, S. Kramberg1, J. Sträter3, S. Eschmann4, M. Hdetzel5, R. Sätzler2, F. Heinzelmann6

Author affiliations

  • 1 Klinik Für Kardiologie Und Pneumologie, Klinikum Esslingen, 73730 - Esslingen am Neckar/DE
  • 2 Thoraxchirurgie, Klinikum Esslingen, 73730 - Esslingen am Neckar/DE
  • 3 Lungenpathologie, Institut für Pathologie, 73730 - Esslingen am Neckar/DE
  • 4 Mvz Nuklearmedizin, Marienhospital Stuttgart, 70199 - Stuttgart/DE
  • 5 Pneumologie, Krankenhaus vom Roten Krezz, Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt/DE
  • 6 Mvz Strahlentherapie, Klinikum Esslingen, 73730 - Esslingen am Neckar/DE

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1295P

Background

Recent trials of immuno-(chemo)therapy (IO) prior to resection in locally advanced NSCLC report high rates of pathological response. However, primarily irresectable patients and oligometastatic patients were excluded from most studies. Moreover, there is no data on chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) after immuno-(chemo)therapy in patients who are primarily not amenable to CRT. Induction IO may enable more NSCLC patients to receive curative treatment.

Methods

We enrolled 86 patients with borderline resectable NSCLC including 22 patients with oligometastatic disease into a prospective real-world trial of induction IO followed by morphologic and metabolic reassessment and multidisciplinary board-guided curative treatment (resection [preferred] or CRT) or palliative therapy.

Results

81 patients (94%) received curative treatment (38 resections, 43 CRT). 21 (55%) of resected patients had a major pathological response including 15 (39%) with pathological complete response. In curatively treated patients, there were 25 recurrences (31%) and 18 tumor-related deaths (22%): 6 recurrences (16%) and 1 death in resected patients, and 19 recurrences (44%) and 17 deaths (40%) in CRT-patients. There were 2 treatment-related deaths (postoperative sepsis, pneumonitis after CRT). The table shows survival of the whole population and oligometastatic patients (median follow-up 19.3 months). Table: 1295P

Definitive Treatment n PFS OS
Median (months) HR CI p Median (months) HR CI p
Whole population 86
Curative 81 30.4 0.0001 (vs. palliative) 0.00002 to 0.0002 <0.0001 43.3 0.13 (vs. palliative) 0.018 to 0.95 0.045
Resection 38 38.5 0.61 (vs. CRT) 0.31 to 1.20 0.15 NR 0.42 (vs. CRT) 0.20 to 0.90 0.026
CRT 43 19.1 0.0006 (vs. palliative) 0.00003 to 0.001 <0.0001 27.4 0.21 (vs. palliative) 0.033 to 1.33 0.098
Palliative 5 3.7 0.0009 (resection vs. palliative) 0.00007 to 0.01 <0.0001 10.9 0.097 (resection vs. palliative) 0.012 to 0.80 0.031
Oligometastatic patients 22
Resection 8 NR 0.24 (vs. CRT) 0.069 to 0.84 0.027 NR 0.15 (vs. CRT) 0.036 to 0.62 0.0089
CRT 13 11.9 - - - 15.3 - - -
Palliative 1 NA - - - NA - - -

Conclusions

In patients with borderline resectable NSCLC including oligometastatic disease, induction immuno-(chemo)therapy resulted in a high rate of curative treatment with promising survival. Resected patients achieved a high rate of prognostically favorable pathological response. Induction IO should be considered both for patients with stage II – III disease and for patients with oligometastatic disease.

Clinical trial identification

NCT04926584.

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

M. Faehling: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, Roche, BMS, MSD; Financial Interests, Institutional, Coordinating PI: MSD, Roche; Financial Interests, Institutional, Local PI: AstraZeneca, Gilead, Daiichi Sankyo, Mirati, Revolution Medicines. S. Kramberg: Financial Interests, Personal, Expert Testimony: Roche. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.