Abstract 1624P
Background
Second line nanoliposomal irinotecan/5-FU/folinic acid (Nal-IRI/5-FU/FA) increases survival of unselected patients (pts) with metastatic PDAC after gemcitabine-based 1st-line therapy. It is not well defined, which parameters are predictive for the efficacy of a 2nd-line treatment.
Methods
In this prospective trial, 151 pts with locally advanced or metastatic PDAC were enrolled for treatment with biweekly Nal-IRI/5-FU/FA (70 mg/m2, 2400 mg/m2, 400 mg/m2) after failure of gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel. Primary end point was the time to treatment failure of the 2nd-line therapy (TTF2). Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and quality of life. To evaluate the impact of 1st-line treatment, pts was divided into three cohorts: TTF1low, -medium and -high. Comparative analyses were performed for the TTF1low and TTF1high cohorts, and for a comprehensive set of potential predictive factors.
Results
146 (97%) pts have received at least one dose of medication. Median treatment duration of 2nd-line treatment was 3.71 [95% CI: 2.50, 4.11] months, with 28.3% on treatment after 6 m. Analyses of the TTF1 low (≤ 120 d, n=50) and TTF1high (≥ 210 d, n=49) cohorts and predictive factors for TTF2 are summarized in the table.
Table: 1624P
Selected predictive factors for TTF2 and OS
TTF2 months (95% CI) | p-value | OS months (95% CI) | p-value | ||
Baseline | |||||
TTF1 | high (N=50) | 3.22 [1.77, 4.01] | 0.790 | 6.41 [4.76, 9.99] | 0.746 |
low (N=49) | 2.83 [2.10, 4.86] | 8.08 [4.73, 10.02] | |||
CA19-9 | <100 U/ml (N=36) | 5.95 [2.10, 7.06] | 0.005 | 9.26 [6.08, 11.89] | 0.035 |
≥100 U/ml (N=104) | 2.86 [2.17, 3.91] | 6.67 [5.45, 8.08] | |||
Leukocyte level | normal (N=111) | 4.07 [3.45, 5.06] | <0.001 | - | - |
abnormal (N=35) | 2.14 [1.28, 2.69] | - | |||
Metastases | liver (N=106) | 2.79 [2.17, 4.01] | 0.047 | - | - |
non liver (N=40) | 4.40 [2.92, 6.24] | - | |||
During treatment | |||||
CA 19-9 decrease (response) | ≥ 50% (N=32) | 6.05 [4.14, 8.94] | <0.001 | - | - |
< 50% (N=81) | 2.14 [1.84, 2.83] | - |
Conclusions
Duration, efficacy, or dose of 1st-line treatment did not correlate with the success of 2nd-line therapy. Significant predictive factors are CA19-9 levels and leucocytes, which correlated with TTF2 and OS. During 2nd line treatment CA19-9 response and reduced pain indicate a benefit from treatment.
Clinical trial identification
EudraCT 2016-005147-17.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
AIO-Studien-gGmbH.
Funding
Servier Deutschland GmbH.
Disclosure
M.P. Lutz: Financial Interests, Personal, Research Funding: Servier. C. Burkart: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Boehringer Ingelheim, Amgen, Bayer. T. Decker: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Novartis, Iomedico; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Novartis, Lilly. A. Gerhardt: Financial Interests, Personal, Royalties: Janssen; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Janssen, Incyte, Novartis, Shire. M.P. Koenigsmann: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, Gilead, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche; Financial Interests, Advisory Board: Takeda. G.M. Siegler: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: BMS, Novartis, Roche, MSD, Janssen; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Janssen; Financial Interests, Institutional, Local PI: BMS, MSD, AstraZeneca; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator: BMS, MSD, AIO GmbH, IKFZ, AstraZeneca, GLA; Non-Financial Interests, Member: AIO GmbH, DGHO, EORTC, DKG. D.T. Waldschmidt: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel: AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, Roche; Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker’s Bureau: AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, Falk, Incyte. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1645P - STAT3, ACTA2, and SPARC stromal markers predict response to Gemcitabine/Cisplatin/Nab-paclitaxel (GCN) in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (apdac)
Presenter: Himil Mahadevia
Session: Poster session 22
1646P - Genomic and prognostic differences in patients with different KRAS mutations in pancreatic cancer
Presenter: Chunwei Xu
Session: Poster session 22
1647P - Cancer-associated endocrine cell: A novel component of tumor microenvironment in pancreatic cancer
Presenter: Yuan Chen
Session: Poster session 22
1648P - Association between circulating tumor cell count and thrombosis in pancreatic cancer
Presenter: Monica Benavente
Session: Poster session 22
1649P - Comprehensive genomic profiling contributes to the prognosis of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer
Presenter: Eiichiro So
Session: Poster session 22
1650P - Identification of potential targets in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: The KRAS Wild-Type subset
Presenter: Daniel Acosta Eyzaguirre
Session: Poster session 22
1651P - Comparison of surgical outcome and prognostic factors between pancreaticobiliary and intestinal types of periampullary adenocarcinoma following pancreaticoduodenectomy
Presenter: Saad Anwar
Session: Poster session 22
1652P - Interaction between enhanced cytokine signalling and ferroptosis defence fuels obesity-associated pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma oncogenesis
Presenter: Rishat Ruzi
Session: Poster session 22
1653P - The activated thermogenesis of intra-pancreatic fat fuels the progression of pancreatic cancer
Presenter: Xi'n'peng Yin
Session: Poster session 22
1654P - Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) as prognostic factor for pancreatic cancer: Updated of a prospective study
Presenter: Natalia Gutierrez Alonso
Session: Poster session 22