Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 23

1885P - Pexa-vec (thymidine kinase-deactivated vaccinia virus plus GM-CSF) in combination with cemiplimab (REGN2810; ANTI-PD-1) for metastatic or unresectable renal cell carcinoma REN026: Results from a phase II study

Date

21 Oct 2023

Session

Poster session 23

Topics

Immunotherapy

Tumour Site

Renal Cell Cancer

Presenters

Sun Young Rha

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2023) 34 (suppl_2): S1013-S1031. 10.1016/S0923-7534(23)01924-5

Authors

S.Y. Rha1, W.K. Bae2, C. Kim3, S.Y. Oh4, H.W. Lee5, K. Park6, N. Mar7, G. Kichenadasse8, H.K. Ha9, R. Pachynski10, I. Park11, K.H. Park12, S.H. Kim13, E. Folefac14, M.D. Mathias15, F. Seebach16, S. Ma17, L. Carranza18, S. Beom1, J.R. Merchan18

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology Department, Yonsei University, 03722 - Seoul/KR
  • 2 Division Of Hemato-oncology, Department Of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School & Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, 519-809 - Hwasun/KR
  • 3 Medical Oncology Dept, Bundang Cha Medical Center, 13496 - Seongnam/KR
  • 4 Department Of Internal Medicine, Dong-A University College of Medicine, 602-812 - Busan/KR
  • 5 Department Of Hematology-oncology, Ajou University School of Medicine, 443-721 - Suwon/KR
  • 6 Medical Oncology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, 626-770 - Yangsan/KR
  • 7 Hematology/oncology Department, UCI Health - University of California Irvine, 92868 - Orange/US
  • 8 Flinders Centre For Innovation In Cancer, Department Of Medical Oncology, FMC - Flinders Medical Centre, 5042 - Bedford Park/AU
  • 9 Department Of Urology, Pusan National University Hospital, 602-739 - Busan/KR
  • 10 Department Of Medicine, Division Of Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, 63110 - St. Louis/US
  • 11 Department Oncology, AsanMedical Center - University of Ulsan, Seoul/KR
  • 12 Medical Oncology, Internal Medicine Dept, Korea University Anam Hospital, 136 705 - Seoul/KR
  • 13 Department Of Internal Medicine, SNUBH - Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 13620 - Seongnam/KR
  • 14 Division Of Medical Oncology, Department Of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, 43210 - Columbus/US
  • 15 Oncology Department, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 10591 - Sleepy Hollow/US
  • 16 Cdra, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc - Corporate Headquarters, 10591 - Tarrytown/US
  • 17 Medical Affair, SillaJen Bio, 94111 - San Francisco/US
  • 18 Medicine, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center - University of Miami, 33136 - Miami/US

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1885P

Background

Pexa-vec (PV) is an oncolytic and immunotherapeutic vaccinia virus engineered to express GM-CSF. The REN026 study assessed the antitumor activity and safety of intravenous (IV) or intratumoral(IT) PV in combination with cemiplimab (REGN2810, anti-PD-1 inhibitor) in patients with metastatic or unresectable renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

Methods

The study enrolled 89 patients with measurable histologically or cytologically confirmed metastatic or unresectable RCC, randomly assigned to one of four study arms. Patients who were treatment-naive to immune check point inhibitors (ICIs) with accessible tumors were randomized into Arm A (IT PV and cemiplimab) or Arm B (cemiplimab monotherapy, upon disease progression PV (IT) was added. Patients who were treatment-naïve to ICIs with non-accessible tumors were assigned to Arm C with IV PV, and those with prior treatment with ICIs were assigned to Arm D with IV PV. PV was given IT (Arms A and B) administered every 2 weeks or IV (Arms C and D) weekly for 3 or 4 treatments as 1× 109 pfu. Cemiplimab IV infusion (all arms) was administered every 3 weeks, at a dose of 350 mg.

Results

Between June 2018 and October 2022, 89 patients were assigned to the study arms as follows: 15 in Arm A, 16 in Arm B, 30 in Arm C, and 28 in Arm D. The median number of prior systemic regimens in the metastatic setting was 1 (0-4) in Arms A, B, and C and 3 (1-5) in Arm D. With the median follow-up of 22.2 months, efficacy outcomes are shown in table. The most common treatment-related adverse event was pyrexia, with a Grade ≥ 3 of 13.3% in Arm A, 0% in Arm B,0% in Arm C, and 3.6% in Arm D. No Grade 5 events occurred in any of the study arms. Table: 1885P

Summary of efficacy results

A (n=15) B (n=16) C (n=30) D (n=28)
IT IV
ORR (95% CI)-% 13.3 (1.7-40.5) 12.5 (1.6-38.4) 23.3 (9.9-42.3) 17.9 (6.1-36.9)
DCR (95% CI)-% 60.0 (32.3-83.7) 56.2 (29.9-80.3) 60.0 (40.6-77.3) 67.9 (47.7-84.1)
PFS median (mo) (80% CI) 4.3 (3.3-6.3) 5.6 (2.1-NA) 4.8 (4.4-8.3) 6.4 (3.6-12.3)
OS median (mo) (80% CI) 22.0 (22.0-NE) 20.8 (19.5-NE) 25.1 (22.7-NE) 18.5 (14.8-NE)
Median duration of response (range,months) 6.1 (3.7-8.5) 7.7 (4.1-11.3) 10.4 (5.5-24.1) 8.5 (1.1-11.3)

Conclusions

The combination immunotherapy of IV PV and cemiplimab demonstrated an acceptable safety profile and encouraging efficacy of ORR and survival with durable responses in patients with metastatic or unresectable RCC, regardless of previous ICI treatment.

Clinical trial identification

NCT03294083.

Editorial acknowledgement

Acknowledgments: None

Legal entity responsible for the study

SillaJen Inc.

Funding

SillaJen Inc

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.