Abstract 2182P
Background
The PRAISE cohort evaluates the incidence, severity and consequences of secondary autoimmune events, OASI (Opportunistic Autoimmunity Secondary to cancer Immunotherapy) or IRAE (Immune-Related Adverse Events). This analysis presents the methodology to involve patients in improving follow-up and tolerability as well as initial Quality of Life (QoL) data.
Methods
PRAISE is a French, longitudinal, observational, prospective, multicentre (59 sites) e-cohort of patients initiating ipilimumab and/or nivolumab cancer immunotherapy using patient-reported outcomes. QoL assessment was designed collaboratively with volunteers from the e-cohort. A literature review and two video conferences with 27 patients guided the choice of QoL questionnaires based on completion time, dimensions, items, and wording.
Results
As of 22/01/2022, monthly patient follow-up forms included a mandatory general QoL questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) and an optional specific questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30). Between 09/12/2019 and 21/04/2023, 861 patients (268 women [31.1%]) were included (age = 66.1 ± 10.9 yrs). Most had lung (SCLC, n=256), kidney (ccRCC, n=204) or melanoma (n=202) cancers and 674 (78.3%) were treated at a metastatic stage. QoL data was available for 409 patients, with 1-month data available for 218 (83.5%) of the 261 patients included after 22/01/22. Of these, 188 (72.0%) completed the EORTC QLQ-C30. The EQ-5D-5L VAS score (67.7 ± 19.9), EQ-5D index (0.66 ± 0.31), and EORTC QLQ-C30 global health score (64.5 ± 21.6) and function scores were significantly worse than in the general population except for emotional functioning (p<0.01). Table: 2182P
1-month QoL sub-scores
EQ-5D-5L (N=218) | Mobility | Self-care | Usual activities | Pain / discomfort | Anxiety / depression |
Problems, N (%) | 105 (48.2)* | 38 (17.5)* | 113 (51.8)* | 146 (67,0)* | 116 (53,2)* |
No problem, N (%) | 113 (51.8) | 180 (82.5) | 105 (48.2) | 72 (33,0) | 102 (46,8) |
EORTC QLQ-C30 (N=188) | Physical functioning | Role functioning | Emotional functioning | Cognitive functioning | Social functioning |
Score, mean (SD) | 72.9 (25.5)* | 67.5 (32.4)* | 77.6 (22.2) | 82.1 (24.5)* | 74.4 (21.6)* |
* Significant difference with general population: EQ-5D-5L: Chi-Squared, p<0.01, comparison values from Gautier et al. 2023. EORTC-QLQ-C30: Double-sided t-test, p<0.01, comparison values from Scott et al. 2008
Conclusions
Patient implication contributed to high response rates to selected QoL questionnaires which show that patients’ QoL and functioning are significantly impaired. Integrating these data in the prospective follow-up of this study will provide a more detailed analysis of cancer immunotherapy and potential OASI on patients.
Clinical trial identification
NCT03849131.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg.
Funding
Bristol Myers Squibb.
Disclosure
J. Gottenberg: Financial Interests, Personal, Financially compensated role: AbbVie, MSD, Janssen, Pfizer, UCB, and Lilly; Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Funding: Bristol Myers Squibb and Roche; Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: Pfizer and Bristol Myers Squibb. C. Chouaid: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AZ, BI, GSK, Roche, Sanofi Aventis, BMS, MSD, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Takeda, Bayer, Janssen and Amgen; Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: AZ, BI, GSK, Roche, Sanofi Aventis, BMS, MSD, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Takeda, Bayer, Janssen and Amgen. P. Barthelemy: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: BMS, MSD, Merck, Pfizer, Ipsen, Bayer, Janssen Cilag, Astellas, Novartis, Amgen, Gilead; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: AstraZeneca, Seagen. S. Oudard: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Astellas and Janssen, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, Merck, Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, and Pfizer; Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: Ipsen; Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Funding: Sanofi. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2172P - Development and evaluation of the usefulness of an immune-related adverse events interview application
Presenter: AKIKO YANO
Session: Poster session 07
2173P - Exploring the complex needs of older patients receiving targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors for renal and skin cancers at the Royal Marsden Hospital
Presenter: Niamh Cunningham
Session: Poster session 07
2174P - The impact of exposure to antibiotic (ATB) and proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy on immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment on overall survival (OS): A population-based study
Presenter: Lawson Eng
Session: Poster session 07
2175P - Sex and age-related differences in immunotherapy-induced toxicities
Presenter: Mafalda Teixeira da Costa
Session: Poster session 07
2176P - Rechallenge of immune checkpoint inhibitors after immune-related adverse events: A systematic review
Presenter: Jin Young Kim
Session: Poster session 07
2177P - Immunotherapy adverse events association with inflammation scores: A real-world data analysis from a Portuguese hospital
Presenter: Catarina Fernandes
Session: Poster session 07
2179P - Prospective monitoring of autoimmune events in cancer immunotherapy patients: A report on the first 658 patients in the PRAISE study
Presenter: Eden Sebbag
Session: Poster session 07
2180P - Detrimental effect of an early exposure to antibiotics on the outcomes of immunotherapy in a multi-tumor cohort of patients
Presenter: Víctor Albarrán
Session: Poster session 07
2181P - Effect of different corticosteroid treatment strategies on checkpoint inhibitors pneumonitis outcomes
Presenter: Hui Guo
Session: Poster session 07
2183P - The relevance of HFpEF in immunotherapy-induced myocarditis: An analysis of 65 patients
Presenter: Adam Chapman
Session: Poster session 07