Abstract 2182P
Background
The PRAISE cohort evaluates the incidence, severity and consequences of secondary autoimmune events, OASI (Opportunistic Autoimmunity Secondary to cancer Immunotherapy) or IRAE (Immune-Related Adverse Events). This analysis presents the methodology to involve patients in improving follow-up and tolerability as well as initial Quality of Life (QoL) data.
Methods
PRAISE is a French, longitudinal, observational, prospective, multicentre (59 sites) e-cohort of patients initiating ipilimumab and/or nivolumab cancer immunotherapy using patient-reported outcomes. QoL assessment was designed collaboratively with volunteers from the e-cohort. A literature review and two video conferences with 27 patients guided the choice of QoL questionnaires based on completion time, dimensions, items, and wording.
Results
As of 22/01/2022, monthly patient follow-up forms included a mandatory general QoL questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) and an optional specific questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30). Between 09/12/2019 and 21/04/2023, 861 patients (268 women [31.1%]) were included (age = 66.1 ± 10.9 yrs). Most had lung (SCLC, n=256), kidney (ccRCC, n=204) or melanoma (n=202) cancers and 674 (78.3%) were treated at a metastatic stage. QoL data was available for 409 patients, with 1-month data available for 218 (83.5%) of the 261 patients included after 22/01/22. Of these, 188 (72.0%) completed the EORTC QLQ-C30. The EQ-5D-5L VAS score (67.7 ± 19.9), EQ-5D index (0.66 ± 0.31), and EORTC QLQ-C30 global health score (64.5 ± 21.6) and function scores were significantly worse than in the general population except for emotional functioning (p<0.01). Table: 2182P
1-month QoL sub-scores
EQ-5D-5L (N=218) | Mobility | Self-care | Usual activities | Pain / discomfort | Anxiety / depression |
Problems, N (%) | 105 (48.2)* | 38 (17.5)* | 113 (51.8)* | 146 (67,0)* | 116 (53,2)* |
No problem, N (%) | 113 (51.8) | 180 (82.5) | 105 (48.2) | 72 (33,0) | 102 (46,8) |
EORTC QLQ-C30 (N=188) | Physical functioning | Role functioning | Emotional functioning | Cognitive functioning | Social functioning |
Score, mean (SD) | 72.9 (25.5)* | 67.5 (32.4)* | 77.6 (22.2) | 82.1 (24.5)* | 74.4 (21.6)* |
* Significant difference with general population: EQ-5D-5L: Chi-Squared, p<0.01, comparison values from Gautier et al. 2023. EORTC-QLQ-C30: Double-sided t-test, p<0.01, comparison values from Scott et al. 2008
Conclusions
Patient implication contributed to high response rates to selected QoL questionnaires which show that patients’ QoL and functioning are significantly impaired. Integrating these data in the prospective follow-up of this study will provide a more detailed analysis of cancer immunotherapy and potential OASI on patients.
Clinical trial identification
NCT03849131.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg.
Funding
Bristol Myers Squibb.
Disclosure
J. Gottenberg: Financial Interests, Personal, Financially compensated role: AbbVie, MSD, Janssen, Pfizer, UCB, and Lilly; Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Funding: Bristol Myers Squibb and Roche; Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: Pfizer and Bristol Myers Squibb. C. Chouaid: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AZ, BI, GSK, Roche, Sanofi Aventis, BMS, MSD, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Takeda, Bayer, Janssen and Amgen; Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: AZ, BI, GSK, Roche, Sanofi Aventis, BMS, MSD, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Takeda, Bayer, Janssen and Amgen. P. Barthelemy: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: BMS, MSD, Merck, Pfizer, Ipsen, Bayer, Janssen Cilag, Astellas, Novartis, Amgen, Gilead; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: AstraZeneca, Seagen. S. Oudard: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Astellas and Janssen, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, Merck, Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, and Pfizer; Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: Ipsen; Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Funding: Sanofi. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2161P - Organization of hospital pharmaceutical consultations for cancer patients receiving oral anticancer drugs: A nationwide cross-sectional study
Presenter: Florian Slimano
Session: Poster session 07
2162P - Can artificial intelligence provide accurate and reliable answers to cancer patients' questions? Comparison of chatbots based on the ESMO Patient Guide about cancer pain
Presenter: Kadriye Bir Yucel
Session: Poster session 07
2163P - Supportive care in French community pharmacies: OncoPharma certification
Presenter: Jérôme Sicard
Session: Poster session 07
2164P - The impact of cancer patients’ face masks on oxygenation and Co2 retention during treatment
Presenter: Mert Sahin
Session: Poster session 07
2165P - A French overview of electronic patient-reported outcomes use in 2022
Presenter: Melina Hocine
Session: Poster session 07
2166P - Long-term consequences of SARS-CoV-2 infection in cancer patients
Presenter: Yana Debie
Session: Poster session 07
2167P - Are bone targeted agents (BTAs) still useful in times of immunotherapy? The SAKK 80/19 BTA study
Presenter: Michael Mark
Session: Poster session 07
2168P - At-home infusion of immunotherapy for patients with solid tumors: First results from a single-centre program
Presenter: Javier Marco Hernández
Session: Poster session 07
2169P - Immunotherapy-based treatment in elderly cancer patients: A real-world multicenter study
Presenter: Mengye He
Session: Poster session 07
2171P - Incidence of adverse events in patients treated with a combination of immune checkpoint blockers and chemotherapy: A real life cohort
Presenter: Layal Rached
Session: Poster session 07