Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Proffered Paper session - Melanoma and other skin tumours

LBA48 - Pathologic response and exploratory analyses of neoadjuvant-adjuvant versus adjuvant pembrolizumab (PEM) for resectable stage IIIb-IV melanoma from SWOG S1801

Date

23 Oct 2023

Session

Proffered Paper session - Melanoma and other skin tumours

Topics

Clinical Research;  Radiological Imaging;  Pathology/Molecular Biology;  Multi-Disciplinary and Multi-Professional Cancer Care;  Response Evaluation (RECIST Criteria);  Immunotherapy

Tumour Site

Melanoma

Presenters

Sapna Patel

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2023) 34 (suppl_2): S1254-S1335. 10.1016/S0923-7534(23)04149-2

Authors

S. Patel1, M. Othus2, P. Wright3, J. Hyngstrom4, C.D. Lao5, T. Truong6, S. Chandra7, K. Kendra8, C. Devoe9, A. Hegde10, A. Mangla11, M. Lowe12, E. Buchbinder13, J.M. Kirkwood14, E. Sharon15, L. Korde16, J. Moon2, V.K. Sondak17, A. Ribas18, V. Prieto19

Author affiliations

  • 1 Melanoma Medical Oncology Department, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 77030 - Houston/US
  • 2 Biostatistics, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 98109-1024 - Seattle/US
  • 3 Surgical Oncology, Spectrum Health, 49301 - Grand Rapids/US
  • 4 Surgical Oncology, University of Utah Health - Huntsman Cancer Institute, 84112 - Salt Lake City/US
  • 5 Department Of Dermatology, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, 48109 - Ann Arbor/US
  • 6 Hematology And Oncology Department, Kaiser Permanente Vallejo Medical Center, 94589 - Vallejo/US
  • 7 Division Of Hematology Oncology, Robert. H. Lurie Cancer Center of Northwestern University, 60611 - Chicago/US
  • 8 Medical Oncology, OSUCCC - The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James, 43210 - Columbus/US
  • 9 Medical Oncology, Northwell Health Cancer Institute, 11042 - Lake Success/US
  • 10 Hematology Oncology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, 35294 - Birmingham/US
  • 11 Hematology And Oncology, Case Western Reserve University / University Hospitals, 44106 - Cleveland/US
  • 12 Surgery, Emory University, 30322 - Atlanta/US
  • 13 Medical Oncology Department, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, 02215 - Boston/US
  • 14 Melanoma Program, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, 15232 - Pittsburgh/US
  • 15 Division Of Cancer Treatment & Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, 20892-9739 - Bethesda/US
  • 16 Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, 20892-9739 - Bethesda/US
  • 17 Surgical Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute - Magnolia Campus, 33612 - Tampa/US
  • 18 Department Of Medicine, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center at UCLA, 90095-1781 - Los Angeles/US
  • 19 Department Of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 77030 - Houston/US

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract LBA48

Background

Primary efficacy results from SWOG S1801 showed an improved event-free survival (EFS) in patients who received neoadjuvant-adjuvant (NAT) PEM compared to adjuvant (AT) PEM. In pooled analyses and smaller neoadjuvant studies, pathologic response has been suggested as an important surrogate marker of clinical outcome.

Methods

S1801 was a randomized phase II trial for clinically detectable, resectable AJCC 8th edition stage IIIB-IV melanoma. Participants were randomized 1:1 to AT PEM (surgery then 18 doses of PEM q3w) or NAT PEM (3 doses pre-operative PEM, surgery, 15 doses PEM q3w). Sites submitted surgical specimens for central review. For determination of pathologic response to NAT, these specimens were assessed for percentage of necrosis and viable tumor by a single pathologist blind to the clinical results.

Results

As of August 31, 2023, 281 participants had surgery (138 NAT, 143 AT). Of those randomized to NAT, 109 specimens were reviewed for pathologic response, 89 were lymph node specimens. Pathologic response and recurrence-free survival (RFS) outcomes for these lymph node specimens are shown in the table. 130 of 138 NAT participants who underwent surgery had RECIST response data; 15 (12%) achieved complete response (CR), 50 (38%) partial response (PR) for an overall response rate of 50%; 50 (38%) experienced stable disease (SD), and 15 (12%) progression of disease (PD). Table: LBA48

Path response N (%) NAT N=89
pathologic complete response (pCR) 36 (40%)
pathologic near complete response (pnCR) 10 (11%)
pathologic partial response (pPR) 26 (29%)
pathologic non-response (pNR) 17 (19%)
2-year RFS1 by path response % (95% CI) N=89
pCR (n=36) 97% (92-100)
pnCR (n=10) 80% (59-100)
pPR (n=26) 73% (58-92)
pNR (n=17) 48% (28-82)
2-year RFS1 by RECIST 1.1 response N=130
CR (n=15) 93% (82-100)
PR (n=50) 89% (81-99)
SD (n=50) 64% (52-80)
PD (n=15) 67% (47-95)

1RFS measured from date of surgery

Conclusions

The use of NAT with single-agent PEM in resectable stage IIIB-IV melanoma results in a 51% major pathologic response rate (pCR + pnCR) with 40% pathologic complete responses. 2-year RFS rates are highest in those achieving pathologic or radiographic response.

Clinical trial identification

NCT03698019.

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

SWOG.

Funding

SWOG, Merck Sharp & Dohme.

Disclosure

S. Patel: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: TriSalus, Cardinal Health, Castle Biosciences, Novartis, BMS, Pfizer, Immatics; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consultant for educational materials: Advance Knowledge in Healthcare; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Advisory Board and Corporate Day speaker (unbranded): Delcath; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Independent Data Monitoring Committee: Immunocore; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consultant: Guidepoint Global; Financial Interests, Institutional, Trial Chair: Provectus Biopharmaceuticals, Bristol Myers Squibb; Financial Interests, Institutional, Local PI: Lyvgen, InxMed, Foghorn Therapeutics, Ideaya, Novartis, Seagen, Syntrix Bio; Financial Interests, Institutional, Steering Committee Member: TriSalus Life Sciences; Non-Financial Interests, Member: ASCO, AACR, International Society of Ocular Oncology, Society for Melanoma Research; Non-Financial Interests, Leadership Role: SWOG. C.D. Lao: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: BMS; Financial Interests, Institutional, Local PI, Research funding: BMS, Novartis, Genentech, Oncosec. A. Hegde: Financial Interests, Institutional, Local PI: BeiGene, Jounce Therapeutics, Cytomx Therapeutics, Calithera Biosciences Inc, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Arcus Biosciences Inc, Takeda Pharmaceuticals Company Ltd, AbbVie Inc. E. Buchbinder: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Instilbio, Nektar, Novartis, BMS, Iovance, Merck, Sanofi, Xilio; Financial Interests, Institutional, Coordinating PI: Genentech, Partners therapeutics; Other, Spouse employment: AstraZeneca, Takeda. V.K. Sondak: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Merck, Bristol Myers Squibb, Iovance, OncoSec, Regeneron, Ultimovacs; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Independent Data Safety Monitoring Committee: Alkermes, Novartis; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Independent medical monitor for clinical trial: Genesis Drug Discovery & Development; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant, Research grant to institution: Turnstone Biologics; Financial Interests, Institutional, Coordinating PI, Per patient funding to institution to support clinical trial: Skyline DX; Financial Interests, Institutional, Local PI, Research grant to institution: Neogene Therapeutics. A. Ribas: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Honoraria for consulting: Amgen, Astra-Zeneca, Merck, Novartis, Jazz; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Member of the Scientific Advisory Board: Apricity, Appia, Arcus, Compugen, Immpact, Lutris, MapKure, Merus, PACT Pharma, Synthekine, Tango; Financial Interests, Personal, Member of Board of Directors, Member of the Board of Directors: Arcus, Lutris, PACT Pharma; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares, Stock ownership: 4C Biomed, Apricity, Appia, Arcus, Compugen, Highlight, ImaginAb, Immpact, Immunesensor, Inspirna, Isoplexis, Lutris, MapKure, Merus, Pluto, Synthekine, PACT Pharma, Tango, Advaxis, CytomX, RAPT, Kite-Gilead; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Arsenal Bio; Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: Agilent, Bristol-Myers Squibb; Non-Financial Interests, Advisory Role, Member of the scientific advisory board: Highlight, Immunesensor, Inspirna, Pluto. V. Prieto: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consultant: Orlucent, Merck, Castle Biosciencies, Novartis. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.