Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 16

2334P - Pathologic patterns following different neoadjuvant therapies in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

Date

21 Oct 2023

Session

Poster session 16

Topics

Cytotoxic Therapy;  Pathology/Molecular Biology;  Immunotherapy

Tumour Site

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Presenters

Annikka Weissferdt

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2023) 34 (suppl_2): S1190-S1201. 10.1016/S0923-7534(23)01928-2

Authors

A. Weissferdt1, C.H. Leung2, B. Sepesi3, W. Nassib William Junior4, H. Lin5, R. Mehran3, D.L. Gibbons6, A. Vaporciyan3, J.V. Heymach6, S. Swisher7, J.J. Lee5, T. Cascone8, A. Pataer3

Author affiliations

  • 1 Pathology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 77030 - Houston/US
  • 2 Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 77030 - Houston/US
  • 3 Thoracic And Cardiovascular Surgery Department, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 77030 - Houston/US
  • 4 Oncology Center, Beneficencia Portuguesa de Sao Paulo - BP Mirante, 01323-030 - Sao Paulo/BR
  • 5 Biostatistics, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 77030 - Houston/US
  • 6 Thoracic Head And Neck Medical Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, 77030 - Houston/US
  • 7 Thoracic & Cardiovascular Surgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center, 77030 - Houston/US
  • 8 Thoracic Head And Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 77030 - Houston/US

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 2334P

Background

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CT), immunotherapy (IT) and combination CT/IT are associated with pathologic treatment response (PTR) in NSCLC. Comparison of pathologic patterns following CT, IT or CT/IT and upfront surgical resection is lacking. Recently, neoadjuvant nivolumab (N), N+ipilumumab (NI), N+CT and NI+CT have been investigated in the NEOSTAR trial (NCT03158129). We analyzed and compared the pathologic patterns of CT, IT and CT/IT-treated NSCLC and untreated resected NSCLC (total n=139).

Methods

Pathologic assessment of resected NSCLC from the NEOSTAR cohort (n=79), a CT-treated group (n=30) and an untreated group (n=30) was performed. H&E-stained tumor sections were scored for parameters commonly associated with PTR: percentages of viable tumor (VT), fibrosis and necrosis and rate of major pathologic response (MPR, ≤10% VT); inflammation (INF), foamy macrophages (FM), lymphovascular invasion (LVI), cholesterol clefts (CC), giant cells (GC), non-necrotizing granulomas (NNG), and neovascularization (NV) were scored from 0-3. Values for each variable were expressed as a median, except MPR (%). Cohorts were compared with Chi-squared or Kruskal-Wallis test and post-hoc pairwise comparisons were performed. Significance was defined as a two-sided p-value <0.05.

Results

NI and NI+CT were associated with significantly less VT (p=0.001, <.001) and more fibrosis (p=0.002, 0.008) than untreated tumors. MPR rates were highest in NI and NI+CT. Necrosis was higher in the CT cohort, INF in N and NI, FM in CT and NI+CT, CC in CT, and NNG in NI and N+CT. Table: 2334P

Summary of scored parameters

Untreated (n=30) CT (n=30) N (n=21) NI (n=16) N+CT (n=22) NI+CT (n=20) p-value
VT 65.8% 48.5% 50% 9% 50.5% 4.5% <.001
Fibrosis 26.3% 26.1% 40.5% 84% 45% 61.4% <.001
Necrosis 0.31% 1.71% 1.5% 0% 0% 0% 0.029
MPR - 17% 24% 50% 32% 55% 0.028
INF 1.37 1.29 2 1.66 1 1.09 0.007
FM 0 0.4 0 0.16 0 0.89 0.015
LVI 0.06 0.23 0 0 0.02 0 0.109
CC 0 0.86 0.4 0 0.13 0.47 <.001
GC 0 0.47 0.2 0.49 0.21 0.28 0.080
NNG (min, max) 0 (0, 0.25) 0 (0, 0) 0 (0, 1.1) 0 (0, 2.66) 0 (0, 2.25) 0 (0, 1.57) 0.004
NV 0 0 0 0.57 0.22 0.18 0.166
.

Conclusions

Neoadjuvant NI and NI+CT regimens were associated with significantly less VT and more fibrosis than untreated tumors and achieved higher rates of MPR compared to CT. Collectively, neoadjuvant IT-based treatments produced higher amounts of INF, FM, and NNG, highlighting the potential impact of dual IT on pathological tumor regression and patterns of immune-mediated features.

Clinical trial identification

NCT03158129.

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Bristol Myers Squibb.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.