Abstract 1288P
Background
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CT) has limited benefit over surgery alone for resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Recent trials have shown promising results for combining immune checkpoint inhibitors with platinum-doublet chemotherapy (ICI plus CT).
Methods
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared neoadjuvant ICI plus CT versus CT alone in patients with resectable NSCLC. We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases, as well as the ASCO, ESMO, and AACR websites. We used a fixed effects model for analysis and assessed heterogeneity with I2 statistics.
Results
We included six RCTs with 2,471 patients, of whom 75% were male, 47% had non-squamous, and 53% had squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). The median age was 63.3 years (ranged from 29 to 88). After neoadjuvant therapy, 84% of patients in the ICI plus CT group underwent surgery compared to 81% in the CT group (p=0.16); R0 resection was reported in 78% versus 67% of patients (p<0.01), respectively. We found a significantly higher pathologic complete response (risk ratio [RR] 5.81 [95%CI 4.26-7.92]) and major pathologic response (RR 3.57 [3.09-4.55]) in patients who received ICI plus CT than those in the CT group. Treatment with ICI plus CT provided a greater benefit of event-free survival (EFS) (HR 0.59 95%CI 0.51-0.67 p<0.00001) and overall survival (HR 0.66 95%CI 0.53-0.82 p=0.0002)compared to CT alone. ICI plus CT improved EFS regardless of PD-L1 expression, type of platinum CT, or histology. Patients with PD-L1 ≥1% achieved considerably better EFS than those with PD-L1 <1% (HR 0.40 vs 0.76, p<0.0001). Subgroup analysis showed EFS benefit for all stages (IB and II, IIIA, and IIIB). Treatment-related adverse events grades 3 or 4 were seen in 36% of patients in the intervention arm and 32% of the control arm (p=0.05).
Conclusions
Neoadjuvant therapy with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 plus CT provided significantly higher pathologic response, EFS, and OS compared to CT alone for resectable stage II-III NSCLC patients. More mature data from the trials are awaited to confirm these findings.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1287P - Comparing the cost-effectiveness of perioperative immunotherapy strategies in non-small cell lung cancer
Presenter: Bharathi Muthusamy
Session: Poster session 04
1289TiP - LANTERN study: A multi-omics digital human avatar for integrating precision medicine into clinical practice for lung cancer patients
Presenter: Emilio Bria
Session: Poster session 04
1294P - A final analysis of a phase II study of durvalumab immediately after completion of chemoradiotherapy in unresectable stage III non–small-cell lung cancer: TORG1937 (DATE study)
Presenter: Tetsuro Kondo
Session: Poster session 04
1296P - Neoadjuvant camrelizumab and apatinib in patients with resectable non-small-cell lung cancer: One-year update from a phase II trial
Presenter: Wei Guo
Session: Poster session 04
1297P - An open-label, prospective phase II study of tislelizumab in combination with chidamide as consolidation therapy in locally advanced, unresectable, stage III NSCLC
Presenter: Yi Hu
Session: Poster session 04
1298P - Chemotherapy with concurrent proton vs. photon radiotherapy in stage III NSCLC: Effects on hematological toxicity and immune therapy
Presenter: Francesco Cortiula
Session: Poster session 04
1299P - The role of radiotherapy in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer after durvalumab-based immunochemotherapy: A retrospective study
Presenter: Lingjuan Chen
Session: Poster session 04
1300P - Treatment and clinical outcome in recurrent/refractory locally advanced NSCLC following chemoradiotherapy and consolidative durvalumab
Presenter: Georg Evers
Session: Poster session 04