Abstract 1093P
Background
IT TAVO-EP (tavokinogene telseplasmid delivered by electroporation) results in localized expression of IL-12 in the tumor microenvironment. This phase II study (NCT04526730) was designed to evaluate NeoAd TAVO-EP in combination with NIVO in subjects with operable, locoregionally advanced melanoma. Pts provided an IRB-approved (Advarra IRB Pro00041794) written informed consent.
Methods
The NeoAd phase comprised up to 3 x4-week cycles of TAVO-EP on days 1, 8 and 15 (optional) concurrently with 480 mg NIVO iv on day 8 of each cycle. Surgery followed and later adjuvant NIVO was initiated. Primary endpoint was pathologic complete response (pCR), secondary endpoints included near pCR (≤10% viable tumor), pathologic major response (pMR; pCR + near pCR) and nonresponse (pNR), among others. Biomaterials were collected at screening, C1D8, C2D1, pre-surgery and during adjuvant phase.
Results
16 pts (7 female, 9 male, cutaneous primary, age 30 – 88) were treated; 9 Stage IIIB, 5 IIIC, 2 IV (M1a) as clinically assessed. Highest-grade (Gr3) treatment-related adverse events included 1 hyponatremia, 2 diarrhea/colitis, 1 pancreatitis, 1 hypertension. One pt currently in NeoAd phase. Among the 15 pts who completed NeoAd phase, median number of NeoAd NIVO was 3 (range 1 - 3) and TAVO-EP 7 (3 - 9). Preoperative response rate (RECIST, unconfirmed) was 9/15 (60%; 95% CI: 55.7- 68.3%); 2 PD, 4 SD, 6 PR, 3 CR. One pt with PR declined surgery and 1 with early distant PD did not have surgery. Among 13 pts who had surgery: 2 pNR, 3 near pCR, 8 pCR; pMR rate was 11/14 (78.6%; 95%CI: 73.7–81.9%). Among those with pMR, there was no melanoma relapse to date with a median follow up of 11.4 months (range 0.9 – 24.6) from surgery. At baseline, many pts had low levels of CD8+ TIL, PD-L1, and IFN-gamma signature scores. Combination therapy induced local and systemic proinflammation changes, including increases in immune-related gene expression profiles, CD8+ TIL and peritumoral T cells.
Conclusions
NeoAd IT TAVO-EP and iv NIVO exhibited promising clinical activity and a favorable safety profile. Enhanced immune activation in responding patients supports the proposed immune mechanisms.
Clinical trial identification
NCT04526730.
Editorial acknowledgement
We are grateful to our patients and family members who volunteered to participate in this clinical trial. We are also grateful to the investigators, reserach coordinators and data managers who contributed to this study.
Legal entity responsible for the study
Moffitt Cancer Center.
Funding
OncoSec.
Disclosure
A. Tarhini: Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding, Contracted Research: OncoSec, Genentech-Roche, Regeneron; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board, Contracted Research: Bristol Myers Squib, Sanofi-Genzyme, Clinigen, Nektar, Merck, Acrotech, Pfizer, Scholar Rock, Checkmate; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: OncoSec, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Eisai, Instil Bio, Regeneron, Sanofi-Genzyme, Novartis, Partner Therapeutics, Genentech/Roche, BioNTech, Concert AI, AstraZeneca, Pfizer. E. Browning, D. Canton: Financial Interests, Personal, Financially compensated role, Employee: OncoSec. V.K. Sondak: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Merck, Bristol Myers Squibb, Iovance, OncoSec, Regeneron, Ultimovacs; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Independent Data Safety Monitoring Committee: Alkermes, Novartis; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Independent medical monitor for clinical trial: Genesis Drug Discovery & Development; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant, Research grant to institution: Turnstone Biologics; Financial Interests, Institutional, Coordinating PI, Per patient funding to institution to support clinical trial: Skyline DX; Financial Interests, Institutional, Local PI, Research grant to institution: Neogene Therapeutics. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
921P - HB-200 arenavirus-based immunotherapy plus pembrolizumab as a first-line treatment of patients with recurrent/metastatic HPV16 positive head and neck cancer
Presenter: Lisle Nabell
Session: Poster session 12
922P - Dose expansion results of the bifunctional EGFR/TGFβ inhibitor BCA101 with pembrolizumab in patients with recurrent, metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
Presenter: Glenn Hanna
Session: Poster session 12
923P - Phase II trial evaluating the efficacy of pembrolizumab combined with vorinostat in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic head & neck squamous cell carcinoma – subgroup analysis of the PEVOsq basket trial
Presenter: Christophe Le Tourneau
Session: Poster session 12
924P - Polyfunctional HPV16-Specific T cell responses in subjects receiving PDS0101 and pembrolizumab combination treatment for recurrent/metastatic HPV16-positive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC)
Presenter: Kevin Harrington
Session: Poster session 12
925P - Treatment discontinuation of immune checkpoint blockade in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma experiencing complete or nearly complete remission
Presenter: Konrad Klinghammer
Session: Poster session 12
926P - UK national real-world outcome data of first-line pembrolizumab treatment in head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC)
Presenter: Ifigenia Vasiliadou
Session: Poster session 12
927P - Patients (pts) with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN) treated with nivolumab (NIVO) in the first-line (1L) or later-line (2L+) settings in Germany: Updated results from the real-world HANNA study
Presenter: Boris Kubuschok
Session: Poster session 12
928P - Prognostic value of body composition and nutritional assessment in recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck (R/M SCCHN) treated with immunotherapy (IO)
Presenter: Zara Vidales Sepulveda
Session: Poster session 12
930P - Platinum and taxane (PT) plus immunotherapy versus immunotherapy alone in patients with recurrent/metastatic (R/M) head and neck cancer (HNSCC)
Presenter: Marcelo Bonomi
Session: Poster session 12