Abstract 306P
Background
PERNETTA trial randomized 210 HER2+ BC patients (pts) to 1st-line trasutuzmab-pertuzumab (T-P) alone or combined with chemo. In the final analysis (median follow-up 63 months), pts with chemo had longer progression free survival (PFS), but similar overall survival (OS) at 2 years. In this ancillary study, we aimed to identify immune biomarkers predicting for long PFS in pts with the chemo-free anti-HER2 strategy.
Methods
Six good and 6 poor responders were selected in each study arm, based on their PFS (total 24 pts); 77 proteins were assessed using GeoMx digital spatial profiling technology in these 24 samples, in the Immune Landscape Laboratory of the Ludwig Institute in Lausanne. Proteins discriminating good versus poor responders were selected to construct a panel of 7 proteins, which was then tested by mIF in the 142 available pts’ samples. After high-definition scanning, the tissue images were analyzed by IFQuant software and the results correlated with pts’ PFS and OS by stratification cox regression.
Results
CD8, GrzB, BCL2, CD44, MET, DAPI, and CK were selected for the final panel. In the chemo-free arm, pts with low expression of CD8-GrzB in stroma or CD8-MET in tumor had similar PFS as pts receiving chemo (p=0.8 and 0.4) and significantly better than the pts with high expressions (p=0.03 and 0.05). Pts without chemo and with low expression of CD8-MET in tumor showed a better OS than the pts with high expression (p=0.02) and even better than the pts having received chemo (p=0.04). In addition, different combined expressions of these biomarkers in stroma and in tumor were able also to discriminate pts with good versus poor outcome in arm A, arm B or whole study population.
Conclusions
Immunity plays a significant role in the efficacy of anti-HER2 treatments. mIF allowing to assess simultaneously several biomarkers presence, intensity and location seems to permit selecting pts with HER2+ advanced stage BC having an excellent outcome in terms of PFS and OS without chemo in 1st line. If validated these biomarkers may contribute to treatment de-escalation and quality of life improvement.
Clinical trial identification
CHUV_DO_CTE_TRP_0001_2017 Ethical committe agreement: 15/07/2021.
Editorial acknowledgement
No
Legal entity responsible for the study
Lausanne University Hospital, Prof. Lana Kandalaft.
Funding
Roche provided an unrestricted funding.
Disclosure
K. Zaman: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, Daiichi, Lilly, Pierre Fabre, Gilead, MSD, Novartis, Seagen, Viatris; Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding, Translational study: Roche; Financial Interests, Institutional, Steering Committee Member: Pierre Fabre; Financial Interests, Institutional, Other, Member of the IDMC of an international trial: Roche; Financial Interests, Institutional, Steering Committee Member, Member of the Steering committee of an international study: Daiichi; Non-Financial Interests, Advisory Board: Swiss Group for Clinical Research Against Cancer (SAKK), Executive Committee of the MINDACT trial; Non-Financial Interests, Member, Representative of SAKK Breast Group: Breast International Group (BIG); Non-Financial Interests, Member: EORTC Breast Group; Other, Unrestricted funding for organization of academic symposium: Agendia, AstraZeneca-MSD, Daiichi, Eisai, Exact Sciences, Lilly, Pierre Fabre, Gilead, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Seagen, Viatris, Vifor; Other, Support for participation in international congress: AstraZeneca, Daiichi, Gilead, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Lilly. J. Huober: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Funding: Celgene, Novartis, Lilly; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Lilly, Novartis, Roche, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, MSD, Celgene, Eisai, AbbVie, Seagen, Gilead, Daiichi; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Lilly, Novartis, Roche, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, MSD, Celgene, AbbVie, Seagen, Gilead; Financial Interests, Institutional, Other, travel grant: Roche, Pfizer, Novartis, Daiichi. P. Weder: Financial Interests, Institutional, Other, travel grants: Roche. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
282P - Analysis of Prosigna in hormone receptor-positive early-stage breast cancer cohort after 8 years of experience at a single institution
Presenter: DANIEL MORCHÓN ARAUJO
Session: Poster session 02
283P - Patient profiles treated with extended adjuvant neratinib in the early access registry study: NEAR study
Presenter: Michelino De Laurentiis
Session: Poster session 02
284P - Prognostic and predictive impact of uPA/PAI-1 in early breast cancer
Presenter: Vanessa Wieder
Session: Poster session 02
285P - Treatment patterns and clinical outcomes of germline BRCA mutation (gBRCAm)-associated breast cancer (BC): A matched, case-control study
Presenter: Stefania Morganti
Session: Poster session 02
286P - Prognostic role of HER2 expression in patients with ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer: Results from a population-based cancer registry study
Presenter: Antonino Musolino
Session: Poster session 02
287P - Perturbation and stability of PAM50 subtyping in population-based primary invasive breast cancer
Presenter: Johan Staaf
Session: Poster session 02
288P - Prognostic factors in nonmetastatic HER2 ‘low’ & HER2 ‘negative’ breast cancer: Single institute experience
Presenter: Alper Türkel
Session: Poster session 02
289P - Results of the window-of-opportunity clinical trial D-BIOMARK: Study of biomarkers of the antitumor activity of denosumab and its role as a modulator of the immune response in early breast cancer
Presenter: Andrea Vethencourt
Session: Poster session 02
290P - Metabolomic profiling and response to neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in early breast cancer (EBC)
Presenter: Alessandra Gennari
Session: Poster session 02
291P - Prognostic implications of HER2 gain in patients with HR+/HER2- breast cancer (BC) and TNBC after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC)
Presenter: Emanuela Ferraro
Session: Poster session 02