Abstract 1906P
Background
In the 2022 WHO classification more than 20 entities of renal cell carcinomas (RCC) were defined. Several molecularly defined RCC were separated. There is urgent need for studies investigating well defined patients with these specific entities. One prerequisite is an exact classification of non-clear cell RCC (nccRCC) including histopathological and molecular diagnostics.
Methods
The SUNNIFORECAST study (NCT03075423) is a phase 2 randomised investigator-initiated trial of nivolumab with ipilimumab vs. standard of care in patients with previously untreated and advanced nccRCC. For study inclusion a reference pathology to confirm diagnosis of nccRCC was mandatory.
Results
350 cases were submitted for reference pathology as paraffin blocks or unstained slides. Diagnoses was done by HE staining, immunohistochemistry and molecular testing. Reference pathology confirmed the diagnoses of nccRCC in 334 of 350 cases. Only few cases were diagnosed in reevaluation as ccRCC, liposarcoma or epithelioid angiomyolipoma. Histopathological diagnoses included papillary RCC (n=138-41%), chromophobe RCC (n=58-17%), RCC, NOS, mostly with sarcomatoid pattern (n=46-14%) TFE3 or TFEB altered RCC (n=25 and n=1,8%), FH-deficient RCC (n=33-10%), SDHB-deficient RCC (n=4-1%), SMARCB1-deficient renal medullary carcinoma (n=9-3%), collecting duct carcinoma (n=14-4%) and tubulocystic RCC (n=1). Interestingly no tumors out of the group of other oncocytic tumous or clear cell papillary renal cell tumors were detected. Compared to primary pathology diagnosis changed in 116/350 cases. There was no correct primary diagnosis in 28/33 cases of FH-deficient RCC, 3/4 cases of SDHB deficient RCC and 17/26 cases of translocation RCC. All chromophobe RCC showed sarcomatoid dedifferentiation or coagulative tumor necrosis. In papillary renal cell carcinoma, micropapillary and microcystic architecture was very frequently detected in G1/G2 tumors.
Conclusions
Reference pathology is a prerequisite for clinical studies investigating ncc RCC. The diagnosis of molecular defined RCC is still problematic in daily diagnosis. The study was supported by a grant of BMS (BMS).
Clinical trial identification
NCT03075423.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
BMS.
Disclosure
A. Hartmann, L. Vorfelder, M. Ahrens, J.B.A.G. Haanen, B. Escudier, A. Ravaud, E. Boleti, G. Gravis, A. Flechon, M. Grimm, J. Bedke, B. Mellado Gonzalez, P. Ivanyi, F. Lange, A. Agaimy, L. Bergmann, C.G. Stöhr: Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: BMS.I. Polifka: Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: BMS.
Resources from the same session
2375P - Neoadjuvant sintilimab combined with gemcitabine and cisplatin (GP) for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) patients followed by selective bladder sparing surgery
Presenter: Zhou Tong
Session: Poster session 23
2376P - Pembrolizumab monotherapy following tri-modality treatment for selected patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer
Presenter: Shang Bin Qin
Session: Poster session 23
2378P - Efficacy and safety outcomes with pembrolizumab (pembro) rechallenge for patients (pts) with advanced/metastatic urothelial cancer (UC) who responded to first-course treatment
Presenter: Vadim Koshkin
Session: Poster session 23
2379P - AVENANCE: Subgroup analysis of patients (pts) with advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) with histological variants from a real-world (RW) study of avelumab first-line maintenance (1LM)
Presenter: Philippe Barthélémy
Session: Poster session 23