Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 12

910P - Machine learning-based survival prediction model for postoperative parotid mucoepidermoid carcinoma

Date

21 Oct 2023

Session

Poster session 12

Topics

Clinical Research;  Radiation Oncology

Tumour Site

Head and Neck Cancers

Presenters

Chen Zihan

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2023) 34 (suppl_2): S554-S593. 10.1016/S0923-7534(23)01938-5

Authors

C. Zihan1, L. Ying2, H. Zongwei2, Q. Sufang2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Radiation Therapy, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, 35000 - Fuzhou/CN
  • 2 Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou/CN

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 910P

Background

Parotid mucoepidermoid carcinoma (P-MEC) is a major histopathological subtype of salivary gland cancer, characterized by heterogeneity and complexity. Traditional clinical models and treatment plans are limited in providing personalized treatment recommendations and clinical management. This study aims to develop a machine learning-based prognostic model to improve survival rate prediction accuracy for P-MEC patients.

Methods

We used SEER database data (2004-2015) for 882 postoperative P-MEC patients. Single-factor Cox regression and four machine learning algorithms (Random Forest, LASSO, XGBoost, Best Subset Regression) were employed for variable selection and importance evaluation. The optimal variable selection model was determined using stepwise backward regression, AIC, and AUC. Bootstrap resampling was applied for internal validation.The model's prediction accuracy was assessed through C-index, ROC curve, and calibration curve. The clinical utility of the model was evaluated via DCA.

Results

The 3-, 5-, and 10-year OS rates for postoperative P-MEC patients were 0.887, 0.841, and 0.753. XGBoost, BSR, and LASSO demonstrated good predictive performance in variable selection and identified 7 independent prognostic factors: age, pathological grade, T stage, N stage, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, and marital status. A nomogram was developed based on the identified predictive variables. Internal validation with 1000 bootstrap resamples yielded consistent results for C-index (3-year, 0.841, 95%CI=0.839-0.844; 5-year, 0.842, 95%CI=0.840-0.845) and AUC (3-year, 0.858, 95%CI=0.856-0.860; 5-year, 0.872, 95%CI=0.870-0.875). The calibration plot indicated good prediction fit.

Conclusions

This study identified age, pathological grade, T stage, N stage, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, and marital status as independent prognostic factors in postoperative P-MEC patients. Machine learning algorithms outperformed traditional analysis methods in variable selection, predictive performance, and variable importance visualization. The developed machine learning-based nomogram offers high accuracy, robust calibration, and clinical application value for postoperative P-MEC patients.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.