Abstract 1447P
Background
IMscin001 Part 2 met its co-primary endpoints of non-inferior drug exposure for Cycle 1 Ctrough and AUC0-21d for atezo SC vs IV ( Burotto ESMO-IO 2022 ). Efficacy, safety and immunogenicity were similar between arms at primary analysis. Here, we report updated data.
Methods
Cancer immunotherapy-naïve patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC for whom platinum therapy had failed were randomised 2:1 to receive 1875 mg atezo SC or 1200 mg atezo IV q3w. Secondary endpoints were efficacy (OS, PFS, ORR, DOR), safety, immunogenicity and PROs. PROs were collected on Day 1 of Cycles 1-6 and then every second cycle until treatment discontinuation. Healthcare providers (HCPs) completed SC and SC vs IV perspective questionnaires after giving ≥3 doses of atezo SC or ≥3 doses of atezo SC and IV each, respectively.
Results
At data cut-off (16 Jan 2023; median follow-up: 9.5 mo), ≈60% of OS events had occurred. Median OS was 10.7 mo for SC vs 10.1 mo for IV; immunogenicity and safety were also similar between arms (Table). Mean PRO scores were within 10% between arms for global health status, role and physical functioning, and satisfaction with therapy. 90% (70/78) of HCPs reported that giving atezo SC was fairly easy/very easy, 85% (66/78) were satisfied/very satisfied with atezo SC and 75% (33/44) agreed that administering atezo SC could save time compared with IV. Table: 1447P
SC (n=247) | IV (n=124) | |
Median administration time (95% CI), min | 7.1 (6.6, 7.4) | 40.0 (37.5, 45.0) |
Efficacy | ||
OS events, % | 58 | 64 |
OS, median (95% CI), mo | 10.7 (8.5, 13.8) | 10.1 (7.5, 12.1) |
Confirmed ORR, (95% CI), % | 11.0 (7.4, 15.6) | 10.5 (5.7, 17.3) |
Confirmed DOR, median (95% CI), mo | 15.1 (5.6, NE) | 11.2 (4.2, NE) |
Safety, % | ||
Any Grade AE | 88 | 84 |
Anaemia | 19 | 17 |
Dyspnoea | 11 | 15 |
Fatigue | 12 | 13 |
Grade 3/4 AE | 21 | 31 |
Grade 5 AE | 6 | 6 |
Serious AE | 19 | 27 |
AE of special interest | 31 | 28 |
Hepatitis | 12 | 14 |
Hypothyroidism | 11 | 7 |
Rash | 9 | 11 |
AE leading to atezo discontinuation | 4 | 7 |
Infusion-related reaction | 0 | 3 |
Injection site reaction | 4 | 0 |
Grade 1/2 | 4 | 0 |
Immunogenicity | ||
ADA incidence, % | 21 | 14 |
NCT03735121. ADA, anti-drug antibody; NE, not estimable.
Conclusions
At this updated analysis, OS data were mature and similar between arms. Safety was also similar and consistent with the atezo IV profile for approved indications. ADA incidence for both arms was in the historic range for atezo IV. PROs were similar for both arms, and HCPs reported easy/very easy administration and potential time savings for atezo SC. These results support atezo SC as an alternative to IV.
Clinical trial identification
NCT03735121.
Editorial acknowledgement
Research support for third-party writing assistance for this abstract, furnished by Marcia Gamboa, PhD, of Health Interactions, was provided by F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.
Legal entity responsible for the study
F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.
Funding
F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.
Disclosure
M. Burotto: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: BMS, AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Roche, Merck. Z. Zvirbule: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca; Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Funding, Research support for third-party writing assistance for this abstract, furnished by Marcia Gamboa, PhD, of Health Interactions, was provided by F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.. R. Alvarez: Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Funding, Research support for third-party writing assistance for this abstract, furnished by Marcia Gamboa, PhD, of Health Interactions, was provided by F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. B. Chewaskulyong: Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Funding, Research funding: Support for third-party writing assistance from F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. L.A. Herraez Baranda: Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Funding, Research funding: Support for third-party writing assistance from F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.; Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. E. Shearer-Kang: Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Funding, Research funding: Support for third-party writing assistance from F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.; Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Genentech, Inc. X. Liu: Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Funding, Research funding: Support for third-party writing assistance from F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.; Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. N. Tosti: Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Funding, Research funding: Support for third-party writing assistance from F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.; Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. A.Y. Castro Sanchez: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd; Financial Interests, Personal, Funding, Research support for third-party writing assistance for this abstract, furnished by Marcia Gamboa, PhD, of Health Interactions, was provided by F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland: F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd. J. Zanghi: Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Funding, Research funding: Support for third-party writing assistance from F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.; Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Genentech. E. Felip: Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Funding, Research funding: Support for third-party writing assistance from F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.; Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd, GSK, Ipsen, Janssen, Medical Trends, Medscape, Merck KGaA, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, PeerVoice, Peptomyc, Pfizer, Sanofi, Springer, Takeda, Touchtime; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Fundación Merck Salud, Merck KGaA.
Resources from the same session
1443P - Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) with cemiplimab plus chemotherapy (CEMI + CHEMO) for first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC): PD-L1 level subgroups in EMPOWER-Lung 3
Presenter: Miranda Gogishvili
Session: Poster session 20
1444P - Sintilimab with two cycles nab-paclitaxel / platinum as first line therapy for advanced squamous non-small-cell lung cancer: The final analysis and biomarker results
Presenter: Huijuan Wang
Session: Poster session 20
1445P - A randomized phase III trial on Pembrolizumab Alone versUs pembrolizumab-chemotherapy in first LInE NSCLC (PAULIEN), results of the interim analysis
Presenter: Ilias Houda
Session: Poster session 20
1449P - The preliminary data from a single-arm, open-label, multicenter phase II clinical trial: KN046 combined with axitinib as first-line (1L) treatment for NSCLC
Presenter: Yuanyuan Zhao
Session: Poster session 20
1450P - Addition of bevacizumab to first-line chemoimmunotherapy in NSCLC with liver metastases
Presenter: Matthieu Roulleaux Dugage
Session: Poster session 20
1451P - Identifying long-term responders to immune checkpoint blockade: Potential utility of serum proteomic profiling in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer
Presenter: Rafael Bach Mora
Session: Poster session 20
1452P - Factors associated with real-world (rw) outcomes among pts with metastatic NSCLC (mNSCLC) receiving select immuno-oncology (IO) regimens: CORRELATE
Presenter: Stephen Liu
Session: Poster session 20