Abstract 76P
Background
It is common for cancer to recur even after successful treatment of the primary tumor. Recurrent or metastatic cancers are less responsive to existing therapies and often have high mortality rate. Whole-cell cancer vaccine, which utilizes patient-derived primary tumor tissue may be a promising approach in preventing recurrence. A major advantage is the provision of a plethora of patient-specific tumor antigens, but overall whole-cell vaccine efficacy is still limited and insufficient. To improve on the efficacy of whole-cell cancer vaccine, we explored the use of different injection methods. It has been previously shown that injection method and location of injection may vary vaccine efficacy and effects. Therefore, we investigated different injection methods to improve the effectiveness of the whole-cell cancer vaccine.
Methods
We compared the efficacy of needle-syringe injection and needle-free (pyro-drive jet injector) injection to evaluate the differences in effectiveness of whole-cell cancer vaccines using murine MC38 colon adenocarcinoma or 4T1 mammary tumor cell lines, by analyzing tumor challenge and the inhibition of cancer metastasis using the C57BL/6 and BALB/c mouse models. We also analyzed the in vitro activation of APCs and innate immune cells using the expelled whole-cell vaccine following each injection method by flow cytometry, cytokine array and quantitative real-time PCR.
Results
Our results showed that whole-cell vaccine administered via needle-free injection induced higher tumor suppression effect and stronger tumor-specific immunity than traditional needle-syringe injection in both MC38 and 4T1 tumor models. In vitro, the whole-cell cancer vaccine preparation discharged through the needle-free injection device induced a stronger immune stimulation on immune cells than from the syringe method.
Conclusions
In contrast to needle injection, needle-free injection of whole-cell cancer vaccine resulted in more pulverized cancer cell fragments, which potentiates APC phagocytosis and adaptive immune activation, thereby improving anti-tumor effect of the vaccine. Therefore, needle-free injection or pre-pulverized formulations should be considered to improve anti-tumor effects of whole-cell cancer vaccines.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Osaka University.
Funding
Japanese Government KAKEN Grants.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
14P - Peripheral immune kinetics in survival prediction of small cell lung cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint blockade therapy
Presenter: MIGUEL GALINDO CAMPOS
Session: Poster session 09
15P - CBL E3 ubiquitin ligases are key inhibitory regulators in PD-1/LAG-3 co-signaling in human cancers, targeted through bispecific co-blockade
Presenter: Luisa Chocarro
Session: Poster session 09
16P - Terminally exhausted CD8+ T cells and increased immunosuppressive soluble factors in malignant ascites of patients with gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis
Presenter: Hye Sook Han
Session: Poster session 09
17P - Continued expansion of long-lived effect CD8+ T cells associates with durable response post-PD-1 blockade
Presenter: Robert Watson
Session: Poster session 09
18P - Exposure of calreticulin is required for vitamin C immunomediated cancer surveillance
Presenter: Alessandro Cavaliere
Session: Poster session 09
19P - Preclinical and clinical significance of VEGF deprivation in ovarian cancer through a specific active immunotherapy
Presenter: Yanelys Morera
Session: Poster session 09
20P - The essential role of DNA repair in the pharmacological activities of AST-3424
Presenter: Fanying Meng
Session: Poster session 09
21P - Implications of KMT2C knockdown for DNA damage repair in breast cancer
Presenter: Philip Bredin
Session: Poster session 09
22P - Clinical significance of DNA damage response mutations in early stage NSCLC
Presenter: Haoran Zhang
Session: Poster session 09
23P - PMC-309: A highly selective anti-VISTA antibody reverses immunosuppressive TME to immune-supportive
Presenter: Cheon Ho Park
Session: Poster session 09