Abstract 76P
Background
It is common for cancer to recur even after successful treatment of the primary tumor. Recurrent or metastatic cancers are less responsive to existing therapies and often have high mortality rate. Whole-cell cancer vaccine, which utilizes patient-derived primary tumor tissue may be a promising approach in preventing recurrence. A major advantage is the provision of a plethora of patient-specific tumor antigens, but overall whole-cell vaccine efficacy is still limited and insufficient. To improve on the efficacy of whole-cell cancer vaccine, we explored the use of different injection methods. It has been previously shown that injection method and location of injection may vary vaccine efficacy and effects. Therefore, we investigated different injection methods to improve the effectiveness of the whole-cell cancer vaccine.
Methods
We compared the efficacy of needle-syringe injection and needle-free (pyro-drive jet injector) injection to evaluate the differences in effectiveness of whole-cell cancer vaccines using murine MC38 colon adenocarcinoma or 4T1 mammary tumor cell lines, by analyzing tumor challenge and the inhibition of cancer metastasis using the C57BL/6 and BALB/c mouse models. We also analyzed the in vitro activation of APCs and innate immune cells using the expelled whole-cell vaccine following each injection method by flow cytometry, cytokine array and quantitative real-time PCR.
Results
Our results showed that whole-cell vaccine administered via needle-free injection induced higher tumor suppression effect and stronger tumor-specific immunity than traditional needle-syringe injection in both MC38 and 4T1 tumor models. In vitro, the whole-cell cancer vaccine preparation discharged through the needle-free injection device induced a stronger immune stimulation on immune cells than from the syringe method.
Conclusions
In contrast to needle injection, needle-free injection of whole-cell cancer vaccine resulted in more pulverized cancer cell fragments, which potentiates APC phagocytosis and adaptive immune activation, thereby improving anti-tumor effect of the vaccine. Therefore, needle-free injection or pre-pulverized formulations should be considered to improve anti-tumor effects of whole-cell cancer vaccines.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Osaka University.
Funding
Japanese Government KAKEN Grants.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
514P - Immunophenotypic profile of glioblastoma microenvironment: A cohort study
Presenter: Lidia Gatto
Session: Poster session 09
515P - A MRI-based radiomics model for predicting the response to anlotinb combined with temozolomide in recurrent malignant glioma patients
Presenter: Shu Zhou
Session: Poster session 09
516P - Building a new prognostic score for patients with central nervous system (CNS) tumors enrolled in early phase clinical trials
Presenter: Kristi Beshiri
Session: Poster session 09
517P - Differentiating IDH-wildtype and IDH-mutant high grade gliomas with deep learning
Presenter: Katherine Hewitt
Session: Poster session 09