Abstract 540P
Background
HPC is a rare solitary fibrous tumor of the central nervous system (CNS), accounting for only 1% of all vascular tumors. Surgery is the standard treatment. However, the role of ART remains controversial. Therefore, we conducted this study to evaluate the impact of ART on the overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) of patients with HPC.
Methods
Data were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2000 and 2019. Patients with a history of cancer or concurrent malignancies, lacking pathologic diagnosis, tumor not arising from the CNS, and those with unknown data were excluded. T-tests and chi-square tests were used to compare variables, while the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazard regression were used to identify prognostic factors of OS and CSS.
Results
The study population comprised 395 patients. Among them 121 patients with “Surgery,” 246 patients with “Surgery + ART”, 10 patients with “Surgery + Chemotherapy” and 18 patients received “Surgery + ART + Chemotherapy”. Of the patients, 55.2% were females, and 60.5% were over 50 years old. The average tumor size was 5 cm. The white group was the largest racial group (N=315). Most cases (51.9%) had a tumor size greater than 5 cm, with a median tumor size of 5 cm. Most cases were localized (65.8%), and a few had distant metastasis (8.6%, n=34). "Surgery + ART" had the best survival outcome 5-year OS of 81.5%, followed by "Surgery + ART + Chemotherapy" and "Surgery + Chemotherapy" both 80%, and "Surgery" at 61.1%. The therapeutic groups showed significant differences in the OS and CSS (p<0.022 and p<0.017, respectively). Localized stage positively impacted OS and CSS, while age and metastasis had a negative impact. Multivariable analysis confirmed that "Surgery + ART" improved both 5-year OS and CSS (HR=0.6, 95%CI:0.42-0.87 and HR=0.33, 95%CI:0.14-0.77, respectively).
Conclusions
Our results showed that ART may improve the OS and CSS in patients with HPC. These findings provide valuable insights into HPC treatment and may inform future clinical decisions. However, further research is needed to validate these results and investigate any potential confounding factors that may have affected the outcomes.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
592P - The role of early change in circulating tumor DNA as a potential predictor of response to chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
Presenter: Jinjia Chang
Session: Poster session 10
594P - The efficacy of anti-EGFR therapy for RAS mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients with RAS mutation negative in circulating-tumor DNA (ctDNA) after 1st- or 2nd-line chemotherapy
Presenter: Naoki Izawa
Session: Poster session 10
595P - The DUREC trial: Durvalumab plus total neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer - a multicenter, single-arm, phase II study (GEMCAD-1703)
Presenter: Jaume Capdevila Castillon
Session: Poster session 10
597P - Surgical quality for patients (pts) treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC): PROSPECT (NCCTG N1048, alliance)
Presenter: Martin Weiser
Session: Poster session 10
598P - Influence of the early stoma closure after low rectal cancer resection on completeness of adjuvant chemotherapy (CoCStom): A randomized, controlled multicentre trial of the AIO (AIO KRK 0113)
Presenter: Flavius Sandra-Petrescu
Session: Poster session 10
599P - R-IMMUNE: A phase Ib/II study to evaluate safety and efficacy of atezolizumab combined with radio-chemotherapy in a preoperative setting for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC)
Presenter: Javier Carrasco
Session: Poster session 10