Abstract 2000P
Background
Immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy have become the standard first-line options in extensive stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) in the past years. However, whether patients can benefit from consolidative thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) after first-line immunotherapy is still undetermined.
Methods
ES-SCLC patients who received standard first-line immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy with/without subsequent TRT were included from 3 cancer centers in China between February 2020 to December 2022. The clinical outcomes and safety were evaluated.
Results
220 ES-SCLC patients were eligible for our analysis, in which 136 received TRT and maintenance immunotherapy after chemotherapy, and 84 received maintenance immunotherapy only. TRT significantly improved the progression-free survival (PFS) (median 10.7 VS 8.5months, HR=0.662 [95% CI: 0.476-0.919], p=0.013), and decreased the intrathoracic lesion progression rate (13.23% VS 40.48%). Further analysis revealed that TRT with different biological effective dose (>60Gy or ≤60Gy), or different dose fractionation mode (conventional fractionation, hypofractionation or hyperfractionation) didn’t impact patient survival. However, addition of TRT in 3-6 weeks after chemotherapy generated significantly superior PFS compared with adding TRT after tumor progression on first-line treatment (median PFS 10.7m VS 8.3m, HR=0.414 [95% CI: 0.207-0.825], p=0.013). In addition, patients without liver metastases or with bone metastases were more likely to benefit from TRT (both p<0.05). TRT slightly increased ≥grade 3 adverse effect (30.88% VS 25%). Notably, the incidence of pneumonia was higher in the TRT group than in the maintenance immunotherapy group (19.9% VS 6%).
Conclusions
The addition of TRT after first-line immunotherapy improves PFS and local control in ES-SCLC patients. TRT should be preferential performed in 3-6 weeks after chemotherapy. Patients without liver metastases or with bone metastases benefit more from TRT. The application of TRT is generally safe excepted for increased pneumonia occurrence.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1594P - End-of-life hospital cancer care in the COVID-19 era: A retrospective population-based study in the Netherlands
Presenter: Ellis Slotman
Session: Poster session 05
1595P - Incidence and characterization of end-of-life (EoL) systemic anticancer therapy (SACT) in melanoma patients (pts): A monocentric experience
Presenter: Silvia Buriolla
Session: Poster session 05
1596P - Exploring the economic impact of palliative care in oncology at the end of life
Presenter: Sarah Gomes
Session: Poster session 05
1597P - Improving in-hospital end-of-life care (EOLC) for oncology patients in a tertiary cancer centre
Presenter: Conor Moloney
Session: Poster session 05
1598P - Differences in referral patterns to the palliative care team among specialized physicians in patients with terminal cancer
Presenter: Hyun Jeong Shim
Session: Poster session 05
1599P - Clinical predictors of 30-day mortality in hospitalized patients with lung cancer: A retrospective single-center observational study
Presenter: Alessandro Leonetti
Session: Poster session 05
1600P - Sarcopenia, depression, and poor health perception among cancer patients registered in an oncology center in Pakistan
Presenter: Sobia Yaqub
Session: Poster session 05
1601P - Relationship between CT and ultrasonography-based sarcopenia and hematologic toxicity in patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy
Presenter: Gurkan Guner
Session: Poster session 05
1602P - Simulation training for compassionate extubation in the pediatric intensive care unit
Presenter: Nicole Fernandez
Session: Poster session 05
1603P - The ability of the LACE index to predict 30-day readmissions in oncology patients
Presenter: Burcu Ulas Kahya
Session: Poster session 05