Abstract 1527P
Background
The FGFR/FGF cascade is a complex intracellular pathway that controls cellular proliferation, tumor growth, angiogenesis, and dissemination. It is implicated in various human cancers including gastric cancer (GC). The FGFR2-amplification in a proportion ranging from 9% to 1.2% worldwide in GC patients. However, previous studies have demonstrated FGFR2-amplification may have poor PFS and OS survival in GC patients. Infigratinib (BGJ398) is a selective ATP-competitive, FGFR1–3 selective oral TKI. We present the data generated from the LB1001-201 trial (NCT05019794) Cohort 1 to evaluate the efficacy and safety of infigratinib monotherapy in previously systemic second-line treated patients harbouring FGFR2 gene amplification.
Methods
Population and eligibility criteria - Failed on prior 2nd -lines treatment or above, locally advanced or metastatic GC/EGJ. FGFR2 gene amplification positive was confirmed via central FISH testing. Adequate organ function and laboratory values. MAPK-MEK or selective FGFR inhibitor treatment-naive. Procedures and treatment - Tumor biopsy or FFPE samples will be tested at the central lab for FGFR2 gene amplification orally infigratinib (125mg, QD) for 3 weeks on, 1 week off in each 28-day cycle; Dose adjustment will be based on drug-related AEs and severity per protocol demanded. Outcomes and assessments - ORR and DCR: Descriptive statistics were used, and an accurate 95% CI was provided. Time-to-event endpoints were summarized using K-M analyses. Safety endpoints were analyzed using frequency and percentage distribution in patients who received at least one dose of infigratinib.
Results
cORR 25.0% (95%CI 8.7, 49.1), DCR 80.0% (95%CI 56.3, 94.3), mDoR 3.8 months (mos) (3.6, NE). mPFS 3.3 mos (95%CI 2.3, 4.5), mOS 8.0 mos (95%CI 4.1, NE). 15/19 patients with tumor shrinkage, the maximum from baseline was -78.5%. ≥ Grade 3 TRAE was 42.9%, most were recoverable. No drug-induced death was reported.
Conclusions
Infigratinib in GC/GEJ patients with FGFR2 gene amplification has shown an inspiring clinical improvement, with acceptable tolerance, which is a potential first TKI regimen that precisely targeting in this population.
Clinical trial identification
NCT05019794.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Shanghai LianBio Development Co., Ltd.
Funding
Shanghai LianBio Development Co., Ltd.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1489P - To investigate the differences in efficacy between immunotherapy and combined immunotherapy in elderly patients with non-small cell lung cancer
Presenter: Ye Mao
Session: Poster session 21
1490P - Removal of TNF-Rs frees TNF-α’s anticancer activity alone or in combination chemo- or immunotherapy in advanced NSCLC
Presenter: Mustafa Bozkurt
Session: Poster session 21
1491P - PD-L1 TPS ≥50% predicts durable response after discontinuing immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer patients
Presenter: Jeongmin Seo
Session: Poster session 21
1493P - A phase II, multi-center, open-label, dose-optimization study evaluating telomere targeting agent THIO sequenced with cemiplimab in patients with advanced NSCLC: Preliminary results
Presenter: Tomasz Jankowski
Session: Poster session 21
1495P - Cemiplimab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer with PD-L1 ≥1%: EMPOWER-Lung 3 results
Presenter: Ana Baramidze
Session: Poster session 21
1496P - Higher levels of CSF-1 support resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced non-small cell lung cancer
Presenter: Paul Takam Kamga
Session: Poster session 21
1497P - Gut microbiome is associated with the clinical response to anti-PD-1 based immunotherapy in untreated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer
Presenter: Yawen Bin
Session: Poster session 21