Abstract 330P
Background
After radiotherapy (RT) to the left breast, the long-term risk of developing various cardiovascular diseases may increase. In our study, we present how deep inspiration treatment changes the doses of organs at risk (OAR), especially the heart. Furthermore, we examined if there is a relationship between the size of the irradiated target area and the dose on the heart.
Methods
From May 2016 to August 2020, 503 patients with left-sided breast cancer underwent RT at our institute. Since May 2018, we have treated our patients in deep breathing (DIBH) using the “voluntary breath-hold” technique. We compared the Dmean and Dmax values for the most critical OAR (left lung, heart, left ventricle, LAD-left anterior descending artery) based on the two treatment methodologies. Subsequently, both groups were then further subdivided into whether the treatment was given by standard fractionation or hypofractionation and created 3-3 groups based on the size of the target area (PTV).
Results
In patients treated with normal fractionation in DIBH vs. without, the doses of the OARs were the following: lung Dmean: 9.3 Gy vs. 9.96 Gy (p=0.029), left ventricle Dmean: 3.52 Gy vs. 7.56 Gy (p=2.69E-27), heart Dmean: 2.78 vs. 5.31 (p=1.11E-24), LAD Dmean 12.17 vs. 25.91 Gy (p=4.63E-24) respectively. In the hypofractionated group with vs. without DIBH the values were lung Dmean: 7.43 Gy vs. 8.08 Gy (p=0.17), left ventricle Dmean: 3.48 Gy vs 6.4 Gy (p=2.64E-10), heart Dmean: 2.64 vs 4.62 (p=2.96E-08), LAD Dmean 11.46 vs 18.35 Gy (p=3.37E-06) respectively. In the standard fractionated group, the average doses for each structure decreased mostly in women with large breast sizes after DIBH treatment. Generally, as the breast size increases, the values of the left ventricle, heart, and LAD increase, whilst the values of the lungs decrease. Although, a significant difference could only be detected in a few categories.
Conclusions
DIBH RT of the left breast significantly reduces radiation exposure to crucial OAR than free-breathing radiation therapy. At the same time, the coverage of the target area does not change, and our results suggest that this benefit is most pronounced in patients with large breast sizes.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
323P - Macrophage population analysis of the breast cancer microenvironment within the context of seroma formation after mastectomy (SerMa pilot study)
Presenter: Felicitas Schneider
Session: Poster session 02
325P - Impact of breast tumour location on axillary nodal involvement, chemotherapy use, and survival
Presenter: Yang Xu
Session: Poster session 02
326P - Sentinel lymph node mapping in breast cancer: Evaluating the dual-tracer method with indocyanine green and radioisotope
Presenter: Ava Kwong
Session: Poster session 02
328P - Frequency of radiotherapy-induced malignancies in Li-Fraumeni syndrome patients with early breast cancer and influence of the radiotherapy technique
Presenter: Vanessa Petry
Session: Poster session 02
329P - Pulmonary function and lung fibrosis up to 12 years after breast cancer radiotherapy
Presenter: Jarle Karlsen
Session: Poster session 02
331P - miR-21 and miR-34a as biomarkers of radiotherapy skin adverse events in ductal carcinoma in situ
Presenter: Tanja Marinko
Session: Poster session 02
332P - Early prediction of residual cancer burden to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer by longitudinal MRI-based multitask learning: A multicenter cohort study
Presenter: Wei Li
Session: Poster session 02
333P - Evaluation of a composite PET/CT and HER2 tissue-based biomarker to predict response to neoadjuvant HER2-directed therapy in early breast cancer (TBCRC026)
Presenter: Maeve Hennessy
Session: Poster session 02