Abstract 265P
Background
Various novel HER2-targeted antibody-conjugated drugs (ADCs) have shown satisfactory antitumor activity in HER2-low-positive breast cancer (BC). The effect of HER2 status on neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and survival outcome is controversial. It is urgent to clarify whether HER2-low-positive tumors have unique biological behavior and should be considered a new molecular subtype. In our study, a 10-year dual-center retrospective research was conducted to analyze the effect of HER2-low-positive status on NAC and survival outcome of BC.
Methods
We screened eligible BC patients and collected relevant information at the First Hospital of Jilin University and the the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University from January 2010 to December 2020. The primary outcome indicator was pathologic complete response(pCR). The secondary outcome indicators were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).
Results
A total of 1027 patients were included in our study cohort, and 66.0% (678/1027) had HER2-low-positive tumors. Compared to HER2-zero, HER2-low-positive patients tended to have more lymph node metastasis, a larger proportion of hormone receptor (HR)-positive tumors, and a lower proliferation rate (Ki-67). The pCR rate of HER2-low-positive was lower than that of HER2-zero patients (19.3% vs 21.6%), especially in the HR-positive subgroup (12.00% vs 20.29%). However, multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that HER2 status was not an independent factor for predicting pCR. HER2-low-positive patients had a higher OS rate in the HR-positive subgroup. The Cox regression model analysis suggested that HER2-low-positive status did not affect the survival outcomes, regardless of DFS (p=0.308) or OS (p=0.066).
Conclusions
HER2-low-positive tumors have unique clinical and pathological characteristics, with a lower pCR rate in the HR-positive subgroup and better survival in the HR-negative subgroup compared to HER2-zero tumors. However, HER2-low-positive status is not an independent predictor of pCR or survival outcome. The authors have equally contributed to the study.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
This study was funded by the Innovation Capability Support Project of Shaanxi Province (No. 2023KJXX-032).
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
304P - Generalizability of 313-SNP PRS for breast cancer risk in non-European ancestries
Presenter: Helen Shang
Session: Poster session 02
305P - Prognostic implications of HER2 changes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with HER2-zero and HER2-low breast cancer
Presenter: Sora Kang
Session: Poster session 02
307P - Identifying new biological subgroups of triple-negative breast cancer using next-generation integrative clustering pipeline
Presenter: Xixuan Zhu
Session: Poster session 02
308P - Regression-based deep-learning predicts breast cancer recurrence risk score from pathology slides
Presenter: Omar El Nahhas
Session: Poster session 02
310P - Longitudinal evaluation of circulating tumour DNA in early breast cancer using a plasma-only methylation-based assay
Presenter: Mitchell Elliott
Session: Poster session 02
311P - Multinational survey study assessing genetic testing and counselling among patients (pts) with breast cancer (MAGENTA): Results on the genetic counselling experience
Presenter: Ranjit Kaur
Session: Poster session 02
312P - Prediction model of breast cancer patient’s neoadjuvant treatment outcome using breast cancer organoids cultured from core needle biopsies
Presenter: Dong Woo Lee
Session: Poster session 02
313P - Intrinsic subtypes in a cohort of early breast cancer patients
Presenter: Theresa Bracht
Session: Poster session 02