Abstract 546P
Background
First-line treatment of PCNSL includes high dose MTX. Nevertheless, MTX is associated with renal toxicity, requiring prolonged hospitalization and potentially compromising chemotherapy completion and so prognosis. Our objective was to identify early predictive factors of MTX delayed elimination.
Methods
We prospectively included all patients referred to our department for newly-diagnosed PCNSL. Daily serum and urinary creatinine and ionogram were collected from the day before MTX administration until elimination. Standard elimination delay of MTX was defined by plasmatic MTX level ≤ 0.05 μg/L before 72 hours. We conducted 2 independent training (TC) and confirmation (CC) cohorts.
Results
We included 64 cures (20 patients) in the TC and 59 cures (22 patients) in the CC between November 2020 to May 2021 and January 2022 to May 2022, respectively. At inclusion, median ages were 71 years (range 33-86) and 74 years (range 47- 87), median KPS were 70% (range 40-80%) and 80% (range 40-100%) and median elimination delay of MTX was 95 hours (range 47-205) and 96 hours (range 62-264) in the TC and the CC respectively. In the TC, median urinary potassium level at day 1 (uK+D1) was 23.9 mmol/L (range 5.5-64.1). In multivariate analysis, older age (p=0.004), low KPS (p=0.036) and high uK+D1 (p=0.001) were associated with delayed MTX elimination. Using a ROC analysis (p=0.008, AUC=0.712), an optimal cutoff for uK+D1 was defined at 17.1 mmol/L with a specificity of 81% and a positive predictive value of 84%. In the CC, we confirmed in multivariate analysis that older age (p=0.002), low KPS (p=0.007) and high uK+D1 (p=0.004) remained associated with delayed MTX elimination. After merging the cohorts, we were able to predict a standard MTX elimination probability based on age and uK+D1. Patients younger than 70 years had a standard MTX elimination probability of 84% versus 33%, depending on low and high uK+D1, respectively. Conversely, older patients had a probability of 26% and 14%, respectively.
Conclusions
uK+D1 may be predictive of delayed MTX elimination, opening personalized perspectives for young patient management. Its relevance as an element of decision making need to be validated in a larger prospective cohort.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
622P - Evaluation of the metastatic colorectal cancer score (mCCS) in predicting outcome for patients with RAS wild type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with first-line (1L) panitumumab (PAN) plus FOLFIRI/FOLFOX: Updated interim results of the non-interventional study VALIDATE
Presenter: Marcel Reiser
Session: Poster session 10
623P - VIC regimen (vemurafenib/irinotecan/cetuximab) versus bevacizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for BRAF V600E-mutated advanced colorectal cancer
Presenter: Yijiao Chen
Session: Poster session 10
624P - Tolerability and safety of vemurafenib, cetuximab combined with camrelizumab for BRAF V600E-mutated /MSS metastatic colorectal cancer
Presenter: Meng Qiu
Session: Poster session 10
625P - Efficacy and safety of the combination of encorafenib and cetuximab in patients with BRAF V600E mutated metastatic colorectal cancer: An AGEO real-world multicentre study
Presenter: Claire Gallois
Session: Poster session 10
626P - Mucinous differentiation (MD) as predictor of response in BRAF-V600E mutated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi) combinations
Presenter: Francisco Javier Ros Montana
Session: Poster session 10