Abstract 75P
Background
Cancer immunotherapy is dependent on immunostimulation to reorganise the tumour microenvironment (TME) and to increase anti-tumour effects of immune cells. There are currently many immunostimulants applicable to cancer therapy, such as antibodies, molecular drugs and PAMP activators. Choice of immunostimulant may be key, but method of delivery of treatment is equally as important as different routes may stimulate different immune pathways. Despite of the rapid development of nucleic acid drugs in recent years, the effect of nucleic acid on tumor immunity needs to be further investigated. Polyinosinic:polycytidylic acid (poly I:C) is a synthetic double-stranded RNA analog that shows promise as an adjuvant in cancer vaccines or immunotherapies. Poly I:C is known to interact with Toll-like receptor 3 (TLR3) when taken up by endocytosis, but when directly transfected into cells, poly I:C stimulates retinoic acid-inducible gene I (RIG-I) instead.
Methods
Poly I:C was used to mimic anti-tumour response after nucleic acid administration. Murine 4T1 mammary tumour-bearing BALB/c mice were treated with poly I:C by electroporation (EP) or syringe injection (SI) and monitored for tumour growth. To determine whether poly I:C-activated immune pathways differed between delivery modes, RIG-I and TLR3 pathway inhibitors were used to inhibit poly I:C-induced anti-tumour effect in 4T1 tumour model.
Results
Our results showed that poly I:C EP treatment induced stronger tumour suppression effect and tumour-specific adaptive immune response than via SI. And that this EP-treated anti-tumour effect could be suppressed by both RIG-I and TLR3 pathway inhibitors, but not in SI, suggesting that treatment of poly I:C via different delivery modes do activate different immune pathways.
Conclusions
We have demonstrated that poly I:C could induce different anti-tumour effects dependent on treatment delivery method. Our results suggest that the effects of nucleic acid drugs may vary depending on how they are administered.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Osaka University.
Funding
Osaka University.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
78P - Peroxiredoxin-1 knockout negatively affects the viability of ph+ B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells and sensitizes them to tyrosine kinase inhibitors
Presenter: Jaromir Hunia
Session: Poster session 09
79P - Co-delivered crizotinib and gefitinib based on nanoparticle for synergically overcoming resistance lung adenocarcinoma treatment
Presenter: Haiyu Zhou
Session: Poster session 09
80P - Steroidal oximes: A new potential therapeutic approach for cancer treatment
Presenter: Mafalda Laranjo
Session: Poster session 09
81P - miR-23b and -133a role on TRAIL-induced apoptosis pathway components expression and TRAIL sensitization in lung adenocarcinoma cells
Presenter: Denise Leite
Session: Poster session 09
83P - Impact of VHL-associated tumor treatment on mental health: An international patient survey
Presenter: Othon Iliopoulos
Session: Poster session 09
84P - Microenvironment immune differences between sexes in multiple myeloma
Presenter: Maria de los Angeles Clavo
Session: Poster session 09
85P - In silico evaluation of the transcriptomic and immunologic profile of lung adenocarcinomas with deletions or disruptive mutations of SMARCA4
Presenter: Ester Garcia Lorenzo
Session: Poster session 09
86P - Effect of chemotherapy-induced autophagic secretome on natural killer cell activity
Presenter: Ayfer Karlitepe
Session: Poster session 09
87P - WIP1 phosphatase promotes etoposide induced autophagy in medulloblastoma and neuroblastoma
Presenter: Hatice Pilevneli
Session: Poster session 09
88P - PPM1D/WIP1 phosphatase mediates basal and genotoxic stress-induced autophagy via ULK-1 de-phosphorylation
Presenter: Ceylan Ak
Session: Poster session 09