Abstract 1633P
Background
Current therapeutic options for patients with a pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) implicate monotherapy (gemcitabine) or combined therapies (modified FOLFIRINOX). mFFX treatment is accompanied by a high toxicity and therefore, administration of mFFX is conditioned by the performance of the patients, rather by rational criteria. In this work, we developed transcriptomic signatures for each drug of the mFFX regimen and validate their clinical interest.
Methods
To extract biologically relevant signatures for 5FU, oxaliplatin and irinotecan, we integrated transcriptomic data from patient-derived primary cell cultures (PDC), patients-derived organoids (PDO) and patient-derived xenografts (PDX) with their corresponding chemo-response profiles to capture the biological components responsible for the response to each drug. The genes displaying the highest levels of contribution defined the signatures 5FUCore, OxaCore and IriCore. We further validated the signatures in a pooled cohort of 167 patients with advanced and metastatic PDAC (94 patients from the COMPASS cohort and 73 from the Angers-Strasbourg cohort).
Results
All three signatures captured high responder patients for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in the mFFX arm exclusively. We then studied the response of patients to 0, 1, 2 and 3 drugs and we identified a positive correlation between the number of drugs predicted as sensitive and the OS and PFS, and with the objective response rate. We next evaluated the level of association between the PurIST classifier and our signatures. We found an association between both OxaCore and IriCore and the classical subtype, but none with 5FUCore. However, we observed in a multivariate Cox regression that our model based on independent signatures displayed higher predictive value for the OS and PFS.
Conclusions
We developed three novel transcriptome-based signatures which define sensitivity for each mFFX components that can be used to rationalize the administration of the mFFX regimen and could help to avoid unnecessary toxic effects.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille, Marseille, France.
Funding
INCa [Grant numbers 2018-078, 2018-079, 2019-037]; Canceropole PACA; Amidex Foundation; ARC foundation and the Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM).
Disclosure
N. Fraunhoffer: Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Local PI: Prediciting Med. M. Bigonnet: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Prediciting Med. J.L. Iovanna, N. Dusetti: Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Licencing Fees or royalty for IP: Predicting Med. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1701P - Cancer premium: Explaining differences in prices for cancer vs non-cancer drugs with efficacy and epidemiological endpoints in the US, Germany, and Switzerland
Presenter: Miquel Serra-Burriel
Session: Poster session 22
1702P - Real-world evidence contributions to European medicines agency’s safety and efficacy evaluations of oncology targeted therapies between 2018-2022
Presenter: Jeroen W. G. Derksen
Session: Poster session 22
1703P - Value of molecular targets and genome-targeted cancer therapies FDA-approved, 2015-2022
Presenter: Ariadna Tibau
Session: Poster session 22
1704P - Clinical benefit of cancer drugs approved by the US food and drug administration based on appropriateness of control arm and its change over time
Presenter: Molto Consolacion
Session: Poster session 22
1705P - Therapeutic value of first vs supplemental indications of drugs in the US and Europe (2011-2020): Retrospective cohort study
Presenter: Kerstin Vokinger
Session: Poster session 22