Abstract 1891P
Background
In a subset of patients (pts), immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) hold the potential to achieve lasting and sustainable responses, or even complete recoveries in pts with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). We sought to understand the immunogenomic determinants of these exceptional responses to ICIs.
Methods
We analyzed pre-therapy genomic and transcriptomic data in treatment-naive metastatic ccRCC pts treated with standard-of-care immunotherapies: (1) combination of PD-1/PDL1 and CTLA-4 (IO/IO), or (2) PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor and VEGF-receptor (IO/VEGF) combination. We also compared baseline characteristics and outcomes between these cohorts and the International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) dataset. We defined 3 groups of pts in each cohort: (a) extreme responders (ER): pts with complete response (CR) and progression free survival (PFS) ≥ 12 months or partial response (PR) with tumor shrinkage 50% and PFS ≥ 24 months or PR with PFS ≥ 36 months; (b) intermediate responders, pts with CR and PR who were not exceptional responders (IR); (c) pts with progressive disease (PD).
Results
550 pts on IO/IO had available whole exome sequencing (WES) data while 434 pts in the IO/VEGF cohort had available WES and RNA-sequencing data. A greater proportion of pts from clinical trials had ER (25%) when compared to real-world data (6%) in the IO/IO cohort. Neither tumor mutation burden, mean HLA-I evolutionary divergence, whole genome integrity index, tumor purity nor tumor ploidy were associated with ER in the trial cohorts. In the IO/IO cohort, clonal neoantigen load (CNL) was significantly higher in ER pts (vs. IR: p=0.043; vs. PD: p=0.017). In a multivariate Cox regression, only CNL remained associated with improved PFS (p = 0.007). In the IO/VEGF cohort, ER pts had high expression of signatures for plasma cells, memory B-cell inside, and tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS). Pts with ER had higher TLS signature score compared to IR and PD using 3 different gene expression signatures.
Conclusions
Our results suggest that ER is partly mediated by clonal neoantigen-driven cytotoxic T-cell responses and TLS formation in the tumor microenvironment.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1726P - Optimizing oncology drug spending in a cancer centre in Ireland
Presenter: Ruth Kieran
Session: Poster session 23
1727P - Barriers and facilitators of physician involvement in clinical oncology database management in Ukraine
Presenter: Inesa Huivaniuk
Session: Poster session 23
1728P - Implementation of a comprehensive oncology unit: Needs detected in cancer survivors during follow-up
Presenter: Francisco J Jimenez-ruiz
Session: Poster session 23
1729P - Targeted interventions in registration and reporting of multidisciplinary team meetings (MDT) in oncology help to improve tumor board decisions
Presenter: Lars Galonska
Session: Poster session 23
1730P - Dealing with digital paralysis: Surviving a cyberattack in a cancer centre
Presenter: Rachel J. Keogh
Session: Poster session 23
1731P - Providing access to anticancer drugs within an armed conflict: The experience of Mission Kharkiv (MK) and Medecins Sans Frontieres (MSF) in Ukraine
Presenter: Stanislav Polozov
Session: Poster session 23
1732P - War and the fragility of anticancer drug supply networks in Ukraine
Presenter: Olha Kostenchak-Svystak
Session: Poster session 23
1733P - Two wars at time: Fight against cancer during war time - experience of Ukraine
Presenter: Veronika Patsko
Session: Poster session 23
1734P - Early impact of a personalized lung cancer interception program for heavy smokers
Presenter: Pamela Abdayem
Session: Poster session 23
1735P - Impact of revised US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) 2021 lung cancer screening guideline on long-term cancer survivors in the United States
Presenter: Qian Wang
Session: Poster session 23