Abstract 1612P
Background
Patient centred outcome measures (PCOMs) are increasingly used to structure proactive symptom assessment and help centre care around the specific needs of the patient. This study aimed to review the use of PCOMs as part of the routine care of inpatients reviewed by the integrated palliative care team in a specialist cancer centre.
Methods
Anonymised electronic palliative care PCOM data were retrieved for inpatients between 7/4/2021 to 31/01/2023, including Integrated Palliative Outcome Scale (IPOS), ECOG performance status, Australian Karnofsky Performance Status (AKPS) and Phase of Illness (POI). Descriptive statistics were used to define the complexity of palliative care needs based on IPOS, PS and POI. The effectiveness of the integrated palliative care service was evaluated by examining the difference between PCOM at initial and follow up assessment.
Results
Digital PCOM records for 1115 episodes of inpatient care were included, of which 391 had follow up data. On initial assessment 63% (703) patients had ECOG PS of 3 or 4 and 77% (864) had AKPS of less than 70. The most prevalent physical symptoms were weakness (84%, 1265), pain (80.7%, 1215), and poor mobility (72.3%, 1089). The most prevalent psychosocial symptom was family or friends feeling anxious or worried (85.8%, 1292). 83% (1250) had at least one palliative care need of severe or overwhelming intensity on initial assessment. 67.5% (753) were in an unstable POI on initial assessment, requiring urgent input. On follow up 92% (328) patients were in a stable, deteriorating or dying POI with no change to the care plan required. In patients with initial moderate to overwhelming symptoms, pain improved in 74%, nausea improved in 84%, vomiting improved in 93%, and constipation improved in 68% at follow up.
Conclusions
The high prevalence of physical and psychosocial symptoms demonstrates the complexity of needs and provides evidence of the requirement for integration of specialist palliative care services in cancer centres. The improvement in symptom scores between initial and follow up assessment demonstrates the effectiveness of integrated palliative care for cancer centre inpatients.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1867P - A cross-sectional examination of information disclosure and health literacy amongst patients with lymphoma
Presenter: Steve Kalloger
Session: Poster session 05
1868P - Challenges for shared decision making in incurable cancer, with a focus on health literacy
Presenter: Chloe Holden
Session: Poster session 05
1871P - The PainRELife ecosystem: A new aid for improving clinical care and shared decision-making in breast cancer patients with chronic pain
Presenter: Marianna Masiero
Session: Poster session 05
1872P - Financial distress of a cancer disease in Germany: A new patient reported outcome measure (PROM) and first results from a bi-centered cross-sectional analysis
Presenter: Sophie Pauge
Session: Poster session 05
1873P - Patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms and self-care behaviours: Preliminary data of a cross-sectional study
Presenter: Valentina Biagioli
Session: Poster session 05
1874P - Beliefs about chemotherapy in Tunisian patients newly diagnosed with cancer
Presenter: Hadhemi Ayadi
Session: Poster session 05
1875P - Behind the use of ChatGPT for oncological purposes: Fears and challenges
Presenter: Ilaria Durosini
Session: Poster session 05
1876P - Cancer stigma: How Tunisian patients perceive their cancer
Presenter: sofiene Fendri
Session: Poster session 05
1877P - Meaning-making in the re-entry phase: A qualitative focus group study with patients with breast cancer and melanoma
Presenter: Anna Visser
Session: Poster session 05