Abstract 327P
Background
Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has been widely used to assess axillary staging. In clinical practice, it is crucial to define sentinel lymph node (SLN) and determine whether the detected nodes are SLNs during the process of SLNB. It is important to consider whether currently existing consensus on SLNB method which is dual-tracer technique may lead to the excessive and unnecessary removal of negative nodes. In addition, no uniform measurable and objective index has been established to define intra-operation palpable nodes, the excision of which may increase the random detection of SLN. The purpose of this study was to optimize the specific method of SLNB.
Methods
To propose an optimal cut-off value for “radioisotope+bule dye” dual-tracer method, the detailed information of (BC) patients who had no clinical node involvement and underwent SLNB from November 2010 to February 2021 was prospectively collected in the breast surgery department of West China Hospital. We analyzed the site and size, radioactivity, the status of blue dye and the pathological results of each node detected of each patients.
Results
A total of 4985 lymph nodes from 1595 BC patients were identified. Only 11.57% (577/4985) SLNs were defined as pathologically positive, resulting in 88.43% (4408/4985) negative nodes removed excessively. By gradually increasing the threshold of radioisotope count in comparison to the hottest SLN, we found that when elevating the cut-off value from 10% to approximately 60%, 17.3% of lymph nodes were spared removal, among which only 0.88% were missed positive SLNs. Raising the optimal cutoff value of radioisotopes to 60% and exempting palpable nodes at the same time could reduce the number of nodes detected by 30.81% with only 1.75% missed positive SLNs. Additionally, multivariate analysis in our study showed that larger tumor size and higher clinical N stage was significantly positively associated with SLN metastasis.
Conclusions
Raising the optimal cut-off value of radioisotope to 60% and exempting palpable nodes may be considered as a potential alternative method to avoid removing excessive negative nodes in SLNB.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Q. Lv.
Funding
West China Hospital, Sichuan University.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
303P - Differential prognostic role of PDGFRA alterations in breast cancer subtypes
Presenter: Panagiotis Vlachostergios
Session: Poster session 02
304P - Generalizability of 313-SNP PRS for breast cancer risk in non-European ancestries
Presenter: Helen Shang
Session: Poster session 02
305P - Prognostic implications of HER2 changes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with HER2-zero and HER2-low breast cancer
Presenter: Sora Kang
Session: Poster session 02
307P - Identifying new biological subgroups of triple-negative breast cancer using next-generation integrative clustering pipeline
Presenter: Xixuan Zhu
Session: Poster session 02
308P - Regression-based deep-learning predicts breast cancer recurrence risk score from pathology slides
Presenter: Omar El Nahhas
Session: Poster session 02
310P - Longitudinal evaluation of circulating tumour DNA in early breast cancer using a plasma-only methylation-based assay
Presenter: Mitchell Elliott
Session: Poster session 02
311P - Multinational survey study assessing genetic testing and counselling among patients (pts) with breast cancer (MAGENTA): Results on the genetic counselling experience
Presenter: Ranjit Kaur
Session: Poster session 02
312P - Prediction model of breast cancer patient’s neoadjuvant treatment outcome using breast cancer organoids cultured from core needle biopsies
Presenter: Dong Woo Lee
Session: Poster session 02