Abstract 327P
Background
Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has been widely used to assess axillary staging. In clinical practice, it is crucial to define sentinel lymph node (SLN) and determine whether the detected nodes are SLNs during the process of SLNB. It is important to consider whether currently existing consensus on SLNB method which is dual-tracer technique may lead to the excessive and unnecessary removal of negative nodes. In addition, no uniform measurable and objective index has been established to define intra-operation palpable nodes, the excision of which may increase the random detection of SLN. The purpose of this study was to optimize the specific method of SLNB.
Methods
To propose an optimal cut-off value for “radioisotope+bule dye” dual-tracer method, the detailed information of (BC) patients who had no clinical node involvement and underwent SLNB from November 2010 to February 2021 was prospectively collected in the breast surgery department of West China Hospital. We analyzed the site and size, radioactivity, the status of blue dye and the pathological results of each node detected of each patients.
Results
A total of 4985 lymph nodes from 1595 BC patients were identified. Only 11.57% (577/4985) SLNs were defined as pathologically positive, resulting in 88.43% (4408/4985) negative nodes removed excessively. By gradually increasing the threshold of radioisotope count in comparison to the hottest SLN, we found that when elevating the cut-off value from 10% to approximately 60%, 17.3% of lymph nodes were spared removal, among which only 0.88% were missed positive SLNs. Raising the optimal cutoff value of radioisotopes to 60% and exempting palpable nodes at the same time could reduce the number of nodes detected by 30.81% with only 1.75% missed positive SLNs. Additionally, multivariate analysis in our study showed that larger tumor size and higher clinical N stage was significantly positively associated with SLN metastasis.
Conclusions
Raising the optimal cut-off value of radioisotope to 60% and exempting palpable nodes may be considered as a potential alternative method to avoid removing excessive negative nodes in SLNB.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Q. Lv.
Funding
West China Hospital, Sichuan University.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
292P - Unlocking the potential of circulating miRNAs in predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Paola Tiberio
Session: Poster session 02
294P - Prognostic significance and evolution of HER2 zero, HER2 low and HER2 positive in breast cancer after neoadjuvant treatment
Presenter: Tong Wei
Session: Poster session 02
295P - ESR1, PGR, ERBB2, MKI67 single gene analysis in neoadjuvant-treated early breast cancer patients
Presenter: Rebekks Spiller
Session: Poster session 02
296P - Identification of metabolism-related therapeutic targets to improve response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancers
Presenter: Françoise Derouane
Session: Poster session 02
297P - Prognostic and predictive impact of NOTCH1 in early breast cancer
Presenter: Julia Engel
Session: Poster session 02
298P - Association of luminal-androgen receptor (LAR) subtype with low HER2 in triple-negative breast cancer
Presenter: Lee Min Ji
Session: Poster session 02
299P - Single-cell transcriptomic analysis reveals specific luminal and T cell subpopulations associated with response to neoadjuvant therapy in early-stage breast cancer
Presenter: Xiaoxiao Wang
Session: Poster session 02
300P - Correlation of PD-L1 protein and mRNA expression and their prognostic impact in triple-negative breast cancer
Presenter: Kathleen Schüler
Session: Poster session 02
301P - Epigenetic modifications of IL-17 gene in patients with early breast cancer and healthy controls
Presenter: Ljubica Radmilovic Varga
Session: Poster session 02
302P - Clinicopathological features and outcomes of pregnancy associated breast cancer: Case control study -single institution experience
Presenter: Nashwa Kordy
Session: Poster session 02