Abstract 1730P
Background
A constellation of a large attack surface of interconnected devices and cyberimmaturity renders healthcare ripe to cybercrime. These vulnerabilities and their consequences will be magnified by the exponential growth in artificial intelligence. We assess the impact and implications of a cyberattack on a national cancer centre.
Methods
On 14 May 2021 (day 0), the first national healthcare ransomware attack occurred within which all hospitals including Cork University Hospital (CUH) Cancer Centre was implicated. Contingency plans were only present in laboratory services who had previously experience information technology (IT) failures. Departmental handwritten logs of activity and responses for 700 days after the attack were reviewed.
Results
Following the attack, all IT systems were shut down. No hospital cyberattack emergency plan was in place. Within CUH, on day 0, all radiotherapy (RT) treatment stopped, outpatient activity fell by 50%, and elective surgery stopped. Haematology, biochemistry and radiology capacity fell by 90% (daily sample deficit (DSD) 2700 samples), 75% (DSD 2,250 samples), and 90% (100% mammography/PETscan) respectively. Histopathology reporting times doubled (7 to 15 days). or paused IT links. Outsourcing of radiology and radiotherapy (RT) commenced, alternative communication networks (e.g., proton mail; Siilo) were utilised and national conference calls for RT and clinical trials were established. 136 patients had interrupted RT: median gap day 6 days category 1, 10 days for remaining patients. By day 28, e-mail communication was restored. By day 210, reporting and data storage backlogs were cleared and over 2000 computers were checked/replaced by the Irish Army. Notification of patients and staff whose data was compromised is ongoing (day 720).
Conclusions
Cyberattacks have rapid, profound and protracted impacts. While laboratory and diagnostic deficits were readily quantified, the impact of disrupted/delayed care on patient outcomes is less readily quantifiable but likely to be much greater. As criminals and nation states weaponize the internet, cyberawareness and cyberattack plans need to be embedded in healthcare.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
R.J. Keogh: Financial Interests, Other, Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: MSD. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1716P - Addressing clinical trial disparities in Spain: A digital solution
Presenter: Max Hardy-Werbin
Session: Poster session 23
1717P - Management of patients during a digital healthcare record system transition: A phase I unit experience
Presenter: Lyra Del Rosario
Session: Poster session 23
1718P - Impact of the economic status of the patient's country of residence on the outcome of oncology clinical trials
Presenter: Saki Nishiyama
Session: Poster session 23
1719P - Decentralized clinical trials: Is there a space in Italy?
Presenter: Celeste Cagnazzo
Session: Poster session 23
1720P - Experience in the provision of oncology services immediately after a major disaster
Presenter: Burak Aktas
Session: Poster session 23
1721P - Self-assessment tool and best-practice sharing to support hospitals in improving the quality of multi-disciplinary teams in lung cancer care
Presenter: Ernest Nadal
Session: Poster session 23
1722P - Factors contributing to differences in evidence compliance rate in cancer treatment among second opinion cases
Presenter: Tomomi Sanomachi
Session: Poster session 23
1723P - Improving access to molecular tumour boards for complex genomic profiles: A healthcare policy from the Netherlands
Presenter: Sahar van Waalwijk van Doorn-Khosrovani
Session: Poster session 23
1724P - Improving access to breast cancer diagnosis and treatment through navigation: Evaluation of a one-year pilot project in Botswana
Presenter: Ariane Migeotte
Session: Poster session 23
1725P - Genetic counselling for cancer in EU member states: Review and foundation for consensus recommendations
Presenter: J. Matt McCrary
Session: Poster session 23