Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 02

337P - Comparison of fused diffusion-weighted imaging using unenhanced MRI and abbreviated post-contrast-enhanced MRI in patients with breast cancer

Date

21 Oct 2023

Session

Poster session 02

Topics

Tumour Site

Breast Cancer

Presenters

Kyeyoung Lee

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2023) 34 (suppl_2): S278-S324. 10.1016/S0923-7534(23)01258-9

Authors

K. Lee

Author affiliations

  • Diagnostic Radiology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, 626-770 - Yangsan/KR

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 337P

Background

To determine the percentage of breast cancers detectable by fused diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) using unenhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and abbreviated post-contrast-enhanced MRI.

Methods

Between October 2016 and October 2017, 194 consecutive women (mean age, 54.2 years; age range, 28-82 years) with newly diagnosed unilateral breast cancer who underwent preoperative 3.0 T breast MRI with DWI were evaluated. Both fused DWI and abbreviated MRI images were independently reviewed by two radiologists for the detection of index cancer (which showed the most suspicious findings in both breasts), location, lesion conspicuity, lesion type, and lesion size. Moreover, the relationship between cancer detection and histopathological results of surgical specimens were evaluated.

Results

Index cancer detection rates were comparable between fused DWI and abbreviated MRI (radiologist 1: 174/194 [89.7%] vs. 184/194 [94.8%], respectively, P = 0.057; radiologist 2: 174/194 [89.7%] vs. 183/194 [94.3%], respectively, P = 0.092). In both radiologists, abbreviated MRI showed a significantly higher lesion conspicuity than fused DWI (radiologist 1: 9.37 ± 2.24 vs. 8.78 ± 3.03, P < 0.001; radiologist 2: 9.16 ± 2.32 vs. 8.39 ± 2.93, P < 0.001). The κ value for the interobserver agreement of index cancer detection was 0.67 on fused DWI and 0.85 on abbreviated MRI. For lesion conspicuity, the intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.72 and 0.82 on fused DWI and abbreviated MRI, respectively. Among the histopathological factors, tumor invasiveness was associated with cancer detection on both fused DWI (P = 0.011) and abbreviated MRI (P = 0.004, radiologist 1), lymphovascular invasion was associated with cancer detection on abbreviated MRI (P = 0.032, radiologist 1), and necrosis was associated with cancer detection on fused DWI (P = 0.031, radiologist 2).

Conclusions

Index cancer detection was comparable between fused DWI and abbreviated MRI, although abbreviated MRI showed a significantly better lesion conspicuity.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The author.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

The author has declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.