Abstract 1898P
Background
ICI rechallenge in solid tumors (including in mccRCC) after discontinuation or disease progression following a prior ICI is often practiced in the clinic and is an area of active investigation. Two ph 3 trials (NCT04338269/Contact-3 and NCT04987203/TiNivo-2) are evaluating this Rx paradigm in mccRCC. Cabo is the most common 2L Rx in mccRCC.
Methods
This study used the de-identified nationwide (US based) Flatiron Health EHR-derived database. Inclusion: diagnosis of mccRCC, receipt of 1L Rx with any ICI based Rx (between 3/2016 to 7/2022) followed by receipt of 2L Rx with cabo or cabo + PD-1i (between 6/2018 to 9/2022). Exclusion: 1L Rx with cabo, or pts with no evidence of contact for 90 days from diagnosis of mccRCC at treating institution to ensure pts were actively engaged in care. TTNT (time to next therapy; measured from 2L to 3L) and overall survival (OS; measured from 2L) were summarized via Kaplan-Meier survival estimates with 95% confidence interval (CI) and compared in the context of propensity score (PS) matching weighted analysis and Cox proportional hazard model (PSM- CoxHzM). PS model included 1L baseline covariates: age, race, smoking status, practice type, insurance, year of 1L, six IMDC risk factors, and missingness of covariates. Missing data were multiply imputed using predictive mean matching on 50 chained equations. All analysis done using R version 4.2.3.
Results
Of 12,285 mccRCC pts in the dataset, 314 pts met eligibilty. Results summarized in table.
Table: 1898P
2L cabo vs cabo-PD-1i in pts with PD-1i based therapy in 1L
Median TTNT (95% CI) mos | Median OS (95% CI) mos | |
Cabo (n=251) | 7.6 (6.9 – 8.9) | 29 (25 - 33) |
Cabo + PD-1i (n=63) | 15 (10, not reached) | 31 (25- not reached) |
PSM- CoxHzM Hazard ratio (95% CI, p-value) | 0.69 (0.45 - 1.06, 0.087) | 1.08 (0.69 - 1.68, 0.74) |
Conclusions
No benefit of adding PD-1i therapy to cabo vs cabo alone in 2 L was observed on PSM – CoxHzM. These results from a real world mccRCC pts are similar to those in a recent press-release on CONTACT-03 trial and question the practice of ICI rechallenge in mccRCC and other solid tumors.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
U. Swami: Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Advisory Board, a consulting or advisory role by Seattle Genetics, Astellas Pharma, Exelixis, Imvax, and AstraZeneca, currently or during the past 2 years. Dr. Swami’s institution has received research funding from Janssen, Seattle Genetics/Astellas, and Exelixis, currently or within the past 2 years: a consulting or advisory role by Seattle Genetics, Astellas Pharma, Exelixis, Imvax, and AstraZeneca, currently or during the past 2 years. Dr. Swami’s institution has received research funding from Janssen, Seattle Genetics/Astellas, and Exelixis, Curren. B.L. Maughan: Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Advisory Board, paid consultant/advisor to AbbVie, Pfizer, AVEO oncology, Janssen, Astellas, BMS, Clovis, Tempus, Merck, Exelixis, Bayer Oncology and Peloton Therapeutics; Huntsman Cancer Institute has received research funding from Exelixis (Inst), Bavarian-Nordic (Inst), Clovis (Inst), Genentech (Inst) and BMS (Inst) on his behalf: paid consultant/advisor to AbbVie, Pfizer, AVEO oncology, Janssen, Astellas, BMS, Clovis, Tempus, Merck, Exelixis, Bayer Oncology and Peloton Therapeutics; Huntsman Cancer Institute has received research funding from Exelixis (Inst), Bava. N. Agarwal: Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Advisory Board, Consultancy to Astellas, AstraZeneca, Aveo, Bayer, BMS, Calithera, Clovis, Eisai, Eli Lilly, EMD Serono, Exelixis, Foundation Medicine, Genentech, Gilead, Janssen, Merck, MEI Pharma, Nektar, Novartis, Pfizer, Pharmacyclics, and Seattle Genetics. Research funding to Neeraj Agarwal's institution: Arnivas, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bavarian Nordic, Bayer, BMS, Calithera, Celldex, Clovis, Crispr, Eisai, Eli Lilly, EMD Serono, Exelixis, Genentech, Gilead, GSK, Immunomedics, Janssen, Lava, Medivation, Merck, Nektar, Neoleukin, New Link Genetics, Novartis, Oric, Pfizer, Prometheus, Rexahn, Roche, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics, Takeda, and Tracon: Consultancy to Astellas, AstraZeneca, Aveo, Bayer, BMS, Calithera, Clovis, Eisai, Eli Lilly, EMD Serono, Exelixis, Foundation Medicine, Genentech, Gilead, Janssen, Merck, MEI Pharma, Nektar, Novartis, Pfizer, Pharmacyclics, and Seattle G. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1902P - Comparison of cabozantinib (CABO) versus sunitinib (SUN) following first-line (1L) nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NIVO+IPI) for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): A target trial emulation using real-world data from the International mRCC Database Consortium (IMDC)
Presenter: Audreylie Lemelin
Session: Poster session 23
1903P - Tumor response by baseline metastases in patients (pts) with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treated with lenvatinib (L) plus pembrolizumab (P) vs sunitinib (S): Post hoc analysis of the CLEAR trial
Presenter: Viktor Gruenwald
Session: Poster session 23
1904P - Treatment options and outcome of metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients with brain or bone metastases: A real-world evidence from a German retrospective multi-center analysis
Presenter: Pia Paffenholz
Session: Poster session 23
1905P - Heterogeneity in tertiary lymphoid structures predicts the distinct prognosis and immune microenvironment of clear cell renal cell carcinoma
Presenter: Wenhao Xu
Session: Poster session 23
1906P - Metastasized non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma: Which entities are dangerous? Results learned from reference pathology of the SuniForecast study
Presenter: Arndt Hartmann
Session: Poster session 23
1907P - Multi-omics mapping positions antigenic myeloid-T cell crosstalk at the core of advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) response to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB)
Presenter: Lisa Kinget
Session: Poster session 23
1908P - Utility of circulating tumor (ct)DNA testing for molecular residual disease (MRD) detection and treatment response monitoring in patients (pts) with renal cell carcinoma (RCC)
Presenter: Michael Smigelski
Session: Poster session 23
1909P - Baseline cytokine levels according to the line of treatment in patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab: NIVOREN GETUG-AFU 26 translational study
Presenter: Larissa Rainho
Session: Poster session 23
1910P - Evaluation of a genome-wide methylome enrichment platform for circulating tumor DNA quantification and prognostic performance in renal cell carcinoma (RCC)
Presenter: Brian Rini
Session: Poster session 23
1911P - Effect of VHL mutations on efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in renal cell carcinoma
Presenter: Guojie Yu
Session: Poster session 23