Abstract 171P
Background
Accurate prediction of PD1/PDL1 inhibitor therapeutic efficacy (TE) as well as any resultant durable clinical benefit (improved progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS)) is not consistently achieved with existing biomarkers like PDL1 or tumor mutational burden(TMB). We hypothesized that a multi-marker (MM) predictive biomarker strategy that tracks plasticity using FOXC1 expression, in parallel to tumor proliferation and immune evasion, using expression of MKI67 and PDL1, respectively, may demonstrate superior TR prediction, and also enable accurate prediction of risk for hyperprogressive disease (HPD).
Methods
Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients enrolled in Checkmate (CM) 009, 010 and 025 clinical trials (n=35, 168, 803) with available pre-treatment tumor RNA-Seq data (n=16, 45, 250 respectively) were analysed for FOXC1, MKI67 and PDL1 expression, and correlated with overall response rate (ORR), PFS, OS and HPD, the latter defined as time-to-treatment-failure <=2 months post-treatment initiation. Optimized biomarker cut-off values based on model area-under-curve were leave-one-out cross validated and prediction algorithms derived to predict Predicted Responders (PR) and Non-Responders (NR). The unmodified strategy was then validated in independent datasets.
Results
In CM025 ORR prediction by MM was specific to the Nivolumab arm [ITT CR%=22.5%, PR CR%=41.8%, NR CR%-3.6% OR=19.4 (4.3- 87.8)95%CI, p<0.0001, n=111] and not the Everolimus arm [ITT CR%=4.6%, PR CR%=3.3%, NR CR%= 5.4%, n=109]. This was confirmed further in combined CM009+CM010 cohorts (OR=9.63 (0.98-94.54) 95%CI, p=0.03). MM-predicted PR consistently displayed superior PFS (p<0.0001) and OS (p=0.03) compared to predicted NR who displayed either Progressive Disease or Hyperprogressive Disease, and were superior to results with PDL1.
Conclusions
Tracking multiple dimensions of cancer biology using our MM approach again proved its superiority in predicting PD1/PDL1 inhibitor efficacy in advanced/metastatic tumors, this time in mRCC patients. This approach merits further testing in prospective clinical trials.
Clinical trial identification
NCT01358721 - October 28, 2021 NCT01354431 - May 12, 2022 NCT01668784 - August 9, 2022.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Partha S. Ray, MD.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
P.S. Ray: Non-Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Onconostic Technologies Inc.; Financial Interests, Institutional, Stocks/Shares: Onconostic. T. Ray, R. Hussa: Financial Interests, Institutional, Stocks/Shares: Onconostic Technologies Inc. C. Taylor: Non-Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Onconostic Technologies Inc.; Financial Interests, Institutional, Stocks/Shares: Onconostic Technologies Inc.
Resources from the same session
227P - Biomarkers for novel NK checkpoint inhibitor anti LLT1 antibody, ZM008: Patient transcriptome analysis
Presenter: M. S. Madhusudhan
Session: Poster session 01
228P - Biomarker discovery via meta-analysis of immunotherapy clinical trials in cancer
Presenter: Benjamin Haibe-Kains
Session: Poster session 01
230P - Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) co-alteration (co-alt) landscape and its impact on erdafitinib (erda) response in the phase II open-label, single-arm RAGNAR trial
Presenter: Yohann Loriot
Session: Poster session 01
231P - Time to deterioration of quality of life as a surrogate of OS: A trial-level surrogacy analysis
Presenter: Adel Shahnam
Session: Poster session 01
232P - Identification of ‘secondary’ germline cancer predisposition variants from somatic tumour testing: Should we evolve towards universal screening?
Presenter: Alejandro Gallego Martinez
Session: Poster session 01