Abstract 1752P
Background
In France, new treatments’ benefit is evaluated by the Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS) to inform on reimbursement and pricing, but they are rarely evaluated afterwards. Although immunotherapies (ITs) considerably improved patients’ survival, few data are available on their clinical benefit at the population-treated level. The objective of this study was to retrospectively quantify the clinical benefit of ITs compared to previous standard of care (SoC) in France from 2014 to 2021.
Methods
Analysis covers all ITs marketed in early access and/or reimbursed in France between 2014 and 2021, regardless of indication, with a cost-effectiveness (CE) model validated by HAS. For year between 2014 and 2021, the number of patients having initiated an IT, per drug and per indication, was retrieved from the French Hospital Reimbursement database. The clinical benefit was expressed as the number of deaths prevented (DP), life years gained (LYG) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of ITs versus their comparators until 2021. DP and LYG were calculated thanks to extrapolated overall survival curves from randomized clinical trials, validated by the HAS. The number of additional QALYs was calculated using utility scores from the HAS CE opinion. Sensitivity analyses were performed according to the population size, survival, utility values and the period of availability.
Results
From 2014 to 2021, 5 ITs (atezolizumab, avelumab, durvalumab, nivolumab and pembrolizumab) were available in monotherapy or in combination in France corresponding to 8 tumor types and 21 indications. Overall, 132,924 patients initiated an IT, mainly in non-small cell lung cancer (66.5%) and melanoma (12.3%). By Dec 31st of 2021, 16,173 [13,803 – 17,141] deaths were prevented compared to previous SoC, representing 12.2% of patients initiating an IT. Compared to previous treatments, ITs allowed 37,318 [33,583 – 41,053] LYG and 27,710 [23,785 – 30,451] QALYs. Nivolumab contributed in 64.6% of LYG and 63.1% of QALYs. Early access of ITs participated in 14.7% of DP, 6.1% LYG and 6.0% QALYs.
Conclusions
Immunotherapies allowed significant clinical benefits for French cancer population in term of DP, LYG and QALYs. This type of analysis should be replicate in other countries.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Bristol Myers Squibb.
Funding
Bristol Myers Squibb.
Disclosure
F. Cotté, A. Gaudin, V. Grumberg: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: BMS. E. Giroux-Leprieur: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Takeda, Jansen, Pfizer. C. Lebbe: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Amgen, Bristol Myers Squib, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Sanofi. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1902P - Comparison of cabozantinib (CABO) versus sunitinib (SUN) following first-line (1L) nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NIVO+IPI) for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): A target trial emulation using real-world data from the International mRCC Database Consortium (IMDC)
Presenter: Audreylie Lemelin
Session: Poster session 23
1903P - Tumor response by baseline metastases in patients (pts) with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treated with lenvatinib (L) plus pembrolizumab (P) vs sunitinib (S): Post hoc analysis of the CLEAR trial
Presenter: Viktor Gruenwald
Session: Poster session 23
1904P - Treatment options and outcome of metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients with brain or bone metastases: A real-world evidence from a German retrospective multi-center analysis
Presenter: Pia Paffenholz
Session: Poster session 23
1905P - Heterogeneity in tertiary lymphoid structures predicts the distinct prognosis and immune microenvironment of clear cell renal cell carcinoma
Presenter: Wenhao Xu
Session: Poster session 23
1906P - Metastasized non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma: Which entities are dangerous? Results learned from reference pathology of the SuniForecast study
Presenter: Arndt Hartmann
Session: Poster session 23
1907P - Multi-omics mapping positions antigenic myeloid-T cell crosstalk at the core of advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) response to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB)
Presenter: Lisa Kinget
Session: Poster session 23
1908P - Utility of circulating tumor (ct)DNA testing for molecular residual disease (MRD) detection and treatment response monitoring in patients (pts) with renal cell carcinoma (RCC)
Presenter: Michael Smigelski
Session: Poster session 23
1909P - Baseline cytokine levels according to the line of treatment in patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab: NIVOREN GETUG-AFU 26 translational study
Presenter: Larissa Rainho
Session: Poster session 23
1910P - Evaluation of a genome-wide methylome enrichment platform for circulating tumor DNA quantification and prognostic performance in renal cell carcinoma (RCC)
Presenter: Brian Rini
Session: Poster session 23
1911P - Effect of VHL mutations on efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in renal cell carcinoma
Presenter: Guojie Yu
Session: Poster session 23