Abstract 2153P
Background
Febrile neutropenia (FN) is one of the most frequent and life-threatening complications in cancer patients. The most widely used model to identify low-risk FN episodes, candidates for outpatient management, is the Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC). However, its ability to predict serious complications is not optimal, occurring in up to 15% of episodes classified as low risk. The identification of circulating biomarkers may refine these indexes. We aimed to evaluate the role of C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) in predicting the development of serious complications in low-risk FN episodes.
Methods
A retrospective study including FN episodes in patients with solid tumors presenting to the Emergency Department (ED), classified as low risk (MASCC score ≥ 21). In all episodes, a blood sample was collected on admission to the ED for analysis, including CRP and PCT. Outcome was defined as Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission and/or death and/or other serious complications. To evaluate the discriminatory ability of biomarkers for outcome, Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used and optimal cutoffs were calculated through Youden index.
Results
During the study period, 132 low-risk episodes were included (mean age: 58.4; SD: 11.5 years; 83 (62.9%) female). Serious complications were developed in 52 (39.4%) episodes. Median CRP and PCT levels were significantly higher in patients developing complications: 11.8 mg/dL (IQR: 5.21-19.6) vs 5.3 mg/dL (IQR: 2.2-9.0), p < 0.001; 0.42 ng/mL (IQR: 0.14-1.09) vs 0.12 ng/mL (0.06-0.23), p < 0.001, respectively. In ROC AUC analysis, both biomarkers achieved a similar predictive accuracy (CRP: 0.733 and PCT: 0.744). Optimal cutoffs were 9.8 mg/dL for CRP (Sensitivity (S): 61.5%, Specificity (Sp): 80%, positive predictive value (PPV): 66.7% and negative (NPV): 76.2%) and 0.27 ng/mL for PCT (S: 61.5%, Sp: 81.3%, PPV: 68.1%, NPV: 76.5%).
Conclusions
In chemotherapy-associated FN patients, circulating CRP and PCT levels might be useful to improve the risk stratification of low-risk episodes, contributing to decision making in the management of these patients.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2162P - Can artificial intelligence provide accurate and reliable answers to cancer patients' questions? Comparison of chatbots based on the ESMO Patient Guide about cancer pain
Presenter: Kadriye Bir Yucel
Session: Poster session 07
2163P - Supportive care in French community pharmacies: OncoPharma certification
Presenter: Jérôme Sicard
Session: Poster session 07
2164P - The impact of cancer patients’ face masks on oxygenation and Co2 retention during treatment
Presenter: Mert Sahin
Session: Poster session 07
2165P - A French overview of electronic patient-reported outcomes use in 2022
Presenter: Melina Hocine
Session: Poster session 07
2166P - Long-term consequences of SARS-CoV-2 infection in cancer patients
Presenter: Yana Debie
Session: Poster session 07
2167P - Are bone targeted agents (BTAs) still useful in times of immunotherapy? The SAKK 80/19 BTA study
Presenter: Michael Mark
Session: Poster session 07
2168P - At-home infusion of immunotherapy for patients with solid tumors: First results from a single-centre program
Presenter: Javier Marco Hernández
Session: Poster session 07
2169P - Immunotherapy-based treatment in elderly cancer patients: A real-world multicenter study
Presenter: Mengye He
Session: Poster session 07
2171P - Incidence of adverse events in patients treated with a combination of immune checkpoint blockers and chemotherapy: A real life cohort
Presenter: Layal Rached
Session: Poster session 07
2172P - Development and evaluation of the usefulness of an immune-related adverse events interview application
Presenter: AKIKO YANO
Session: Poster session 07