Abstract 1151P
Background
Cutaneous adnexal tumors comprise a heterogenous group of both benign and malignant tumors evolving from the four primary adnexal structures. Malignant adnexal tumors encompass a variety of histologic subtypes with varying clinical presentation. Due to the rarity of these conditions, incidence and prevalence is not well understood. In a retrospective analysis, estimated five-year Overall Survival (OS) and Disease-Free Survival (DFS) were estimated at 73% and 98%, respectively. There is a paucity of data surrounding the preferred clinical management of cutaneous adnexal tumors due to the rarity of these entities.
Methods
Patients with malignant adnexal tumors were identified using the National Cancer Database (NCDB). We examined demographic, clinicopathologic, and treatment information. Excluded from our cohort were patients with metastatic or unknown disease stage, positive or unknown margin status, unknown radiation and/or chemotherapy status, and unknown vital status. Chi-square analyses were used to assess differences across sebaceous versus non-sebaceous histologies. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate the effects of treatment modalities on overall survival after controlling for relevant covariates (age, race, and stage).
Results
3,694 patients were included in the final analysis. The most prevalent malignant cutaneous adnexal tumor included sebaceous carcinoma (n=1699, 46%), eccrine porocarcinoma (n = 568, 15.4%), and skin appendage carcinoma (n =415, 11.2%). In patients with fully resected cutaneous adnexal tumors with negative surgical margins, multivariable results showed that receipt of adjuvant radiation was associated with statistically significantly longer survival compared to not receiving radiation (HR .76 (95%CI 0.61 – 0.96)). Non-sebaceous histology was also associated with longer survival than sebaceous histology (HR 0.78 (95% CI 0.69 – 0.88)). After stratifying by histologic groups, adjuvant radiation was associated with longer overall survival in sebaceous carcinoma (HR 0.62 (95% CI 0.42 – 0.92)), while receipt of adjuvant radiation in non-sebaceous histology groups was not associated with overall survival (HR 0.85 (95% CI 0.65 – 1.13)). Use of adjuvant chemotherapy following R0 resection was not associated with overall survival in the sebaceous group, while in the non-sebaceous group, chemotherapy was associated with shorter overall survival (HR 3.92 (95% CI 1.94 – 7.92)).
Conclusions
Acknowledging the limitations of a retrospective evaluation of real-world data, there does not appear to be a benefit for adjuvant chemotherapy after R0 resection in cutaneous adnexal carcinomas. Alternatively, omission of adjuvant radiotherapy was associated with an increased risk of mortality.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1129P - Effect of subsequent therapies including checkpoint inhibitors on overall survival in a phase III randomized trial of tebentafusp in first-line metastatic uveal melanoma: Long-term follow-up
Presenter: Marlana Orloff
Session: Poster session 13
1130P - Tebentafusp (tebe) in an ongoing cohort of 72 French patients (pts) with metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM)
Presenter: Leah Mailly-Giacchetti
Session: Poster session 13
1131P - Management of metastatic uveal melanoma (MUM) patients on tebentafusp in a real-world setting
Presenter: Mauricio Fernando Ribeiro
Session: Poster session 13
1132P - Chemokine expression in uveal melanoma and association with tumor genetics and response to immunotherapy
Presenter: Aparna Nallagangula
Session: Poster session 13
1133P - SF3B1 mutation predicts improved overall survival in metastatic uveal melanoma patients: Molecular and clinical correlates
Presenter: Luis del Carpio Huerta
Session: Poster session 13
1134P - Safety and efficacy of low dose (LD) ipilimumab (Ipi) + pembrolizumab (pem) in checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) naïve patients (pts) with melanoma brain metastases (MBM)
Presenter: Isabella Glitza
Session: Poster session 13
1135P - Comparison of intracranial (IC) response assessment criteria in patients (pts) with melanoma brain metastases (MBM) treated with combination nivolumab (NIVO) plus ipilimumab (IPI) in CheckMate 204
Presenter: Raymond Huang
Session: Poster session 13
1136P - Regorafenib combined with BRAF-/MEK-inhibitors for the treatment of refractory melanoma brain metastases
Presenter: Iris Dirven
Session: Poster session 13
1138P - Intralesional administration of L19IL2/L19TNF in difficult-to-treat non-melanoma skin cancer shows a favorable safety profile and preliminary clinical activity
Presenter: Lukas Flatz
Session: Poster session 13