Abstract 1727P
Background
Oncology databases/cancer registries can help facilitate quality cancer care and novel research. Their maintenance remains challenging in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). We explored barriers and facilitators of oncology database maintenance in Ukraine.
Methods
We conducted semi-structured interviews with a purposeful sample of oncology physicians at the Ukraine National Cancer Institute (NCI) to explore barriers and facilitators of oncology database data entry and use. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed via hybrid analysis.
Results
13 physicians were interviewed, including 6 (46%) junior and 7 (54%) senior NCI faculty. All were aware of local or international oncology databases. 10 (77%) entered patient data into them, including 7 (54%) to international and 8 (62%) to local databases. 6 (69%) thought that most of their oncology colleagues in Ukraine are not aware of the existence or value of cancer databases. The following themes have been identified: perceived benefits of cancer databases included improving patient care, research, standardizing clinical practice, care monitoring, and quality improvement. Obstacles of data entry included: time required, low quality of medical documentation, complex online interface. Some thought that physicians should be responsible for data entry, while others thought it should be done by nonmedical providers. Facilitators of data entry included appointing a physician leader to oversee quality and engagement, direct direction from supervisor, use for research publication or as part of a project of personal interest, monetary compensation, collaborating with colleagues abroad, data entry training.
Conclusions
Factors affecting data entry into and use of local and international cancer databases by oncology physicians in Ukraine included perceived benefits for career and patient care, required time, requirements from leadership, database technology characteristics. Given limited resources for local and population-based cancer registry maintenance in Ukraine and other LMICs, novel low-cost strategies for this are urgently needed.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1726P - Optimizing oncology drug spending in a cancer centre in Ireland
Presenter: Ruth Kieran
Session: Poster session 23
1728P - Implementation of a comprehensive oncology unit: Needs detected in cancer survivors during follow-up
Presenter: Francisco J Jimenez-ruiz
Session: Poster session 23
1729P - Targeted interventions in registration and reporting of multidisciplinary team meetings (MDT) in oncology help to improve tumor board decisions
Presenter: Lars Galonska
Session: Poster session 23
1730P - Dealing with digital paralysis: Surviving a cyberattack in a cancer centre
Presenter: Rachel J. Keogh
Session: Poster session 23
1731P - Providing access to anticancer drugs within an armed conflict: The experience of Mission Kharkiv (MK) and Medecins Sans Frontieres (MSF) in Ukraine
Presenter: Stanislav Polozov
Session: Poster session 23
1732P - War and the fragility of anticancer drug supply networks in Ukraine
Presenter: Olha Kostenchak-Svystak
Session: Poster session 23
1733P - Two wars at time: Fight against cancer during war time - experience of Ukraine
Presenter: Veronika Patsko
Session: Poster session 23
1734P - Early impact of a personalized lung cancer interception program for heavy smokers
Presenter: Pamela Abdayem
Session: Poster session 23
1735P - Impact of revised US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) 2021 lung cancer screening guideline on long-term cancer survivors in the United States
Presenter: Qian Wang
Session: Poster session 23
1736P - Young adult lung cancer demands more attention in a low-resource area: Bangladesh perspective
Presenter: Muhammad Rafiqul Islam
Session: Poster session 23