Abstract CN86
Background
For people living with advanced breast cancer (ABC), specialist nursing is recognised as an essential component of care. However, access to specialist education and training in ABC is limited, contributing to variability in the availability of clinical specialist nurse services throughout Europe. The ABC4Nurses education programme was co-designed with experts by experience and profession in ABC and translated into four European languages following a systematic review and Delphi study to determine priority topics for nurse education in ABC. The aim of this study is to evaluate the implementation and perceived impact of the education programme from the perspectives of nurses who have completed the programme.
Methods
A mixed-methods evaluation was undertaken, guided by the Kirkpatrick framework (1967). Questionnaires were administered prior to commencing the programme to evaluate expectations for the programme (T1), and immediately after completion of the programme (T2) to assess overall satisfaction and personal views of the programme. Semi-structured qualitative interviews were held with a smaller number of participants to explore the perceived impact of the programme on ABC care in the participants’ place of work.
Results
Of 655 registered participants, 188 (29%) participated in T1, and to date, 53 (30%) of these participants have completed all 6 modules, and the T2 questionnaire. T1 participants (n=188) were from the UK (27%), Spain (26%), Turkey (18%) and the Czech Republic (13%). ABC4Nurses has been evaluated positively by T2 participants (n=53), with 94% reporting that the programme has helped them in their work and would recommend this programme to their co-workers. On average, participants felt prepared to care for people with ABC (Mean: 8.2, SD: 1.5) and were committed to applying learning from the programme in their roles (Mean: 9.1, SD: 1.6).
Conclusions
This study shows that a novel, co-designed online learning programme in ABC was effective in enhancing cancer nurses’ confidence and commitment to the delivery of care to people living with ABC. Furthermore, the results demonstrate the potential reach of the programme as a result of the programme being available in an accessible, translated format.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Dublin City University.
Funding
Pfizer.
Disclosure
T. Wiseman, A. Drury: Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: EONS/Pfizer. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
CN9 - Communicating with patients in modern cancer care
Presenter: Alison Woods
Session: Poster session 25
Resources:
Abstract
CN10 - Development and usability test of an individualized nutrition management application (iNutrition) for post-discharged gastric cancer patients following gastrectomy
Presenter: Xiao-han Jiang
Session: Poster session 25
Resources:
Abstract
CN11 - Improving quality of life for patients with prostate cancer: ProstaGYM, a new digital skill
Presenter: Enrique Gallardo
Session: Poster session 25
Resources:
Abstract
CN12 - Integrating weekly symptom monitoring for patients with prostate cancer in radiation oncology: A prospective cohort study using electronic patient-reported outcomes
Presenter: Pia Møller
Session: Poster session 25
Resources:
Abstract
CN14 - Quality of the abeona health app according to the onco-haematology patient in the Principality of Andorra: Preliminary results
Presenter: Carlota de Miguel Barbero
Session: Poster session 25
Resources:
Abstract
CN15 - Real-life clinical and organizational evaluation of telemonitoring and assisted telemonitoring in more than 1500 cancer patients
Presenter: Sophie Martin
Session: Poster session 25
Resources:
Abstract
CN16 - The Mount Vernon Cancer Center non medical prescriber GI oncology clinic experience
Presenter: Melanie Blyth
Session: Poster session 25
Resources:
Abstract
CN17 - Use of the ONCO'nect telemonitoring tool by socially deprived outpatients actively treated for a solid cancer: A retrospective quantitative and qualitative analysis of the Re'connect program
Presenter: coralie BOITEAU
Session: Poster session 25
Resources:
Abstract
CN20 - Nurse’s role in coordinating new cancer screening initiatives: Experiences from an on-going risk-based lung cancer screening feasibility study, among Swedish women
Presenter: Nina Nordgren
Session: Poster session 25
Resources:
Abstract
CN21 - Stakeholder perceptions of cervical screening accessibility and attendance in Ireland: A qualitative study
Presenter: Sophie Mulcahy Symmons
Session: Poster session 25
Resources:
Abstract