Abstract 2165P
Background
Monitoring symptoms and toxicities through the use of electronic objects (electronic patient-reported outcomes, ePRO) has been shown to improve overall survival and quality of life in several clinical trials in oncology. We intended to investigate the use of ePRO in France in 2022.
Methods
An electronic form was sent to pharmacists in 416 cancer departments. Data were collected from October 2022 to December 2022. Pharmacists were asked about their use of ePRO, funding, potential improvements, and barriers to implementation.
Results
We obtained a participation rate of 25% (114/416 cancer departments, 2 were excluded due to misunderstanding). Only 13% (n=15) use ePRO.
ePRO users mentioned potential improvements in the technology : implementation of the ePRO platform directly into the patient record and a desire to improve communication between professionals (n=5). Difficulties they encountered were mainly interoperability, which affects efficiency (n=5), and lack of human resources (n=3).
Of the 97 who do not use ePRO, 42% (n=41) are unaware of the existence of ePRO. 67% (n=65) of them would like to implement ePRO and hospital implementation is planned in 28% (n=27) of cancer departments. They describe possible difficulties due to lack of time to check patients' answers (74%, n=72), lack of human resources (67%, n=65), lack of financial resources (n=6, 6%), and digital literacy in elderly patients (5%, n=5).
Conclusions
A majority of cancer departments showed interest into ePROs. Two categories of improvements were identified : human resources to help with deployment, and better software to improve interoperability. The reimbursement of electronic monitoring starting in 2023 in France will encourage its incorporation in routine practice.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2173P - Exploring the complex needs of older patients receiving targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors for renal and skin cancers at the Royal Marsden Hospital
Presenter: Niamh Cunningham
Session: Poster session 07
2174P - The impact of exposure to antibiotic (ATB) and proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy on immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment on overall survival (OS): A population-based study
Presenter: Lawson Eng
Session: Poster session 07
2175P - Sex and age-related differences in immunotherapy-induced toxicities
Presenter: Mafalda Teixeira da Costa
Session: Poster session 07
2176P - Rechallenge of immune checkpoint inhibitors after immune-related adverse events: A systematic review
Presenter: Jin Young Kim
Session: Poster session 07
2177P - Immunotherapy adverse events association with inflammation scores: A real-world data analysis from a Portuguese hospital
Presenter: Catarina Fernandes
Session: Poster session 07
2179P - Prospective monitoring of autoimmune events in cancer immunotherapy patients: A report on the first 658 patients in the PRAISE study
Presenter: Eden Sebbag
Session: Poster session 07
2180P - Detrimental effect of an early exposure to antibiotics on the outcomes of immunotherapy in a multi-tumor cohort of patients
Presenter: Víctor Albarrán
Session: Poster session 07
2181P - Effect of different corticosteroid treatment strategies on checkpoint inhibitors pneumonitis outcomes
Presenter: Hui Guo
Session: Poster session 07
2182P - Patient involvement to improve prospective follow-up: Quality of life data after cancer immunotherapy from the PRAISE study
Presenter: Eden Sebbag
Session: Poster session 07
2183P - The relevance of HFpEF in immunotherapy-induced myocarditis: An analysis of 65 patients
Presenter: Adam Chapman
Session: Poster session 07