Abstract 1867P
Background
Health literacy of patients is a requirement for shared decision making. However, little is known about the experiences of patients with lymphoma with regard to health literacy and information disclosure from their treating physicians. We sought to explore health literacy through a survey deployed across a large and diverse group of patients with lymphoma.
Methods
The 2022 Lymphoma Coalition (LC) Global Patient Survey (GPS) was completed by 7113 patients from 84 countries. We sought to understand how patients initially understood their disease. Responses to the question: “To what extent, if at all, were diagnostic tests and results explained to you?” were stratified across core demographics and tabulated. Tests for significant differences across strata were computed with JMP Pro v17.
Results
Of the 6684 respondents who indicated a level of satisfaction or dissatisfaction with regard to the comprehension of diagnostic and laboratory tests, 58% and 42% were males and females respectively with a median age of 60 and range of 18 - 97 years. Overall, 36% of respondents reported poor comprehension. Increasing age was a significant positive predictor of health literacy with a Range OR = 6.9 [5.4 - 8.9]. Likewise, male biological sex was a significant predictor of improved comprehension OR = 1.5 [1.3 - 1.6]. Regional disparities were identified that indicated North America and Europe had the highest rates of satisfactory comprehension with 72% and 68% respectively. This was contrasted with the Asia-Pacific region at 53% (p<0.0001).
Conclusions
One of the goals of precision medicine is to deliver the right therapeutics to the right patient at the right time. [LW1] Shared decision making has the ability for patients to provide valuable feedback to their treating physicians. However, a lack of health literacy essentially excludes patients from participating in the decision making process. All three demographics examined above indicated highly significant disparities that can have adverse ramifications on healthcare equity. We feel that patients should understand their disease and the available treatment options which will yield increased participation in their care.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
AbbVie, BMS, Pharmacyclics and Roche.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1866P - Unmasking the extent of hidden sexual distress in young breast cancer survivors
Presenter: Zeineb Naimi
Session: Poster session 05
1868P - Challenges for shared decision making in incurable cancer, with a focus on health literacy
Presenter: Chloe Holden
Session: Poster session 05
1871P - The PainRELife ecosystem: A new aid for improving clinical care and shared decision-making in breast cancer patients with chronic pain
Presenter: Marianna Masiero
Session: Poster session 05
1872P - Financial distress of a cancer disease in Germany: A new patient reported outcome measure (PROM) and first results from a bi-centered cross-sectional analysis
Presenter: Sophie Pauge
Session: Poster session 05
1873P - Patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms and self-care behaviours: Preliminary data of a cross-sectional study
Presenter: Valentina Biagioli
Session: Poster session 05
1874P - Beliefs about chemotherapy in Tunisian patients newly diagnosed with cancer
Presenter: Hadhemi Ayadi
Session: Poster session 05
1875P - Behind the use of ChatGPT for oncological purposes: Fears and challenges
Presenter: Ilaria Durosini
Session: Poster session 05
1876P - Cancer stigma: How Tunisian patients perceive their cancer
Presenter: sofiene Fendri
Session: Poster session 05
1877P - Meaning-making in the re-entry phase: A qualitative focus group study with patients with breast cancer and melanoma
Presenter: Anna Visser
Session: Poster session 05