Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 05

1867P - A cross-sectional examination of information disclosure and health literacy amongst patients with lymphoma

Date

21 Oct 2023

Session

Poster session 05

Topics

Psycho-Oncology;  Survivorship

Tumour Site

Lymphomas

Presenters

Steve Kalloger

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2023) 34 (suppl_2): S1001-S1012. 10.1016/S0923-7534(23)01947-6

Authors

S.E. Kalloger1, A. Watson1, S. Sajkowski2, L. Warwick3

Author affiliations

  • 1 Research And Information, Lymphoma Coalition - Head Office, L5G 2T4 - Mississauga/CA
  • 2 Research, Lymphoma Coalition, L5G 2T4 - Mississauga/CA
  • 3 Executive, Lymphoma Coalition - Head Office, L5G 2T4 - Mississauga/CA

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1867P

Background

Health literacy of patients is a requirement for shared decision making. However, little is known about the experiences of patients with lymphoma with regard to health literacy and information disclosure from their treating physicians. We sought to explore health literacy through a survey deployed across a large and diverse group of patients with lymphoma.

Methods

The 2022 Lymphoma Coalition (LC) Global Patient Survey (GPS) was completed by 7113 patients from 84 countries. We sought to understand how patients initially understood their disease. Responses to the question: “To what extent, if at all, were diagnostic tests and results explained to you?” were stratified across core demographics and tabulated. Tests for significant differences across strata were computed with JMP Pro v17.

Results

Of the 6684 respondents who indicated a level of satisfaction or dissatisfaction with regard to the comprehension of diagnostic and laboratory tests, 58% and 42% were males and females respectively with a median age of 60 and range of 18 - 97 years. Overall, 36% of respondents reported poor comprehension. Increasing age was a significant positive predictor of health literacy with a Range OR = 6.9 [5.4 - 8.9]. Likewise, male biological sex was a significant predictor of improved comprehension OR = 1.5 [1.3 - 1.6]. Regional disparities were identified that indicated North America and Europe had the highest rates of satisfactory comprehension with 72% and 68% respectively. This was contrasted with the Asia-Pacific region at 53% (p<0.0001).

Conclusions

One of the goals of precision medicine is to deliver the right therapeutics to the right patient at the right time. [LW1] Shared decision making has the ability for patients to provide valuable feedback to their treating physicians. However, a lack of health literacy essentially excludes patients from participating in the decision making process. All three demographics examined above indicated highly significant disparities that can have adverse ramifications on healthcare equity. We feel that patients should understand their disease and the available treatment options which will yield increased participation in their care.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

AbbVie, BMS, Pharmacyclics and Roche.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.