Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 04

1267P - Whether hospice-based palliative care is cost-effective in resource-limited settings of the Republic of Kazakhstan

Date

10 Sep 2022

Session

Poster session 04

Presenters

Islam Salikhanov

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2022) 33 (suppl_7): S581-S591. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1066

Authors

I. Salikhanov1, S. Wieser2, B. Crape3, M.C. Katapodi4

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Faculty, University of Basel - Medizinische Fakultät, 4056 - Basel/CH
  • 2 School Of Management And Law, ZHAW - Zurich University of Applied Sciences, 8401 - Jona/CH
  • 3 Public Health, Nazarbayev University, 10000 - Nur-Sultan/KZ
  • 4 Nursing Department, University of Basel - Faculty of Medicine - Institut fur Pflegewissenschaft – Nursing Science (INS), 4056 - Basel/CH

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1267P

Background

In Kazakhstan, about 34,000 patients were diagnosed with cancer and 14,000 patients died from oncological diseases in 2021. According to the Quality of Death Index, Kazakhstan ranks 50th out of 80 countries assessed. Currently, some form of inpatient end-of-life care in Kazakhstan is provided by only 9 hospices, several nursing homes, palliative care units, and mobile teams. In 2020, the total number of palliative care beds did not exceed 980 across the country, while around 135,000 patients need palliative care at any given time. The objective of this study is to assess the cost-effectiveness of hospice-based palliative care for terminal cancer patients compared to treatment in palliative units of cancer centers.

Methods

182 family caregivers have been recruited: 104 from hospices and 78 from cancer centers. Patients’ state of health and family caregivers’ burdens have been measured using Palliative Outcome Scale (POS) and Zarit Carer Burden Interview (ZBI) on the 14th day of inpatient palliative care. Direct, indirect treatment costs, and family caregivers’ out-of-pocket expenditures (OOPs) associated with the care, have been collected. The cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted by combining the mean cost difference with the data on outcome differences (POS and ZBI on the 14th day). Uncertainty around the cost-effectiveness estimates was explored by generating 10,000 resamples using bootstrapping and computing cost, and outcome differences for each and plotted on the cost-effectiveness plane.

Results

The mean difference in ECOG performance status between the two groups was not statistically significant at the time of admission (p=0,.061). After 14 days of treatment, patients’ mean quality of life was 2.4 points better (95% CI: 0.06 – 4.9) and family caregiver burden was 4.6 points better (95% CI: -0.26 - 9,.3) in the hospice group compared to the control. Mean treatment costs over 14 days were $31 lower for the hospice group (95% CI: $29 - $32). There was a significant correlation between the total cost of treatment and patients’ quality of life (r = 0,.58; p < 0.01).

Conclusions

This analysis suggests that hospice-based palliative care is cost-effective compared to the care provided in palliative units of cancer centers.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

TRANSLATE with x English.

Legal entity responsible for the study

Islam Salikhanov.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.