Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 11

1413P - Tumor transcriptomic profiling of patients (pts) with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) who do not achieve optimal PSA response to intensified androgen deprivation therapy (ADT-I)

Date

10 Sep 2022

Session

Poster session 11

Topics

Cancer Biology;  Endocrine Therapy;  Molecular Oncology

Tumour Site

Prostate Cancer

Presenters

Vinay Mathew Thomas

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2022) 33 (suppl_7): S616-S652. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1070

Authors

V. Mathew Thomas1, B. Chigarira1, N. Sayegh1, E.J. Hernandez2, N. Tripathi1, S. Adidam Kumar1, D. Goel1, C. Tandar1, T.R. Mcfarland1, M. Yandell2, R. Nussenzveig1, D. Sirohi3, U. Swami1, B.L. Maughan1, N. Agarwal1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Division Of Medical Oncology, Department Of Internal Medicine, University of Utah Health - Huntsman Cancer Institute, 84112 - Salt Lake City/US
  • 2 Genetics, University of Utah, 84112 - Salt Lake City/US
  • 3 Anatomic Pathology, University of Utah and ARUP Laboratories, 84124 - Salt Lake City/US

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1413P

Background

Pts with mCSPC undergoing ADT-I and achieving a PSA nadir ≤0.2 ng/mL (PSA-L) any time after start of therapy was associated with improved overall survival (OS) versus those with a PSA nadir >0.2 ng/mL (PSA-H) (HR: 0.17, P<0.0001) (Chi AUA 2021, abstract 1281). We hypothesized that tumor gene expression profiling in PSA-H would be distinct from PSA-L.

Methods

Eligibility: confirmed mCSPC on ADT-I with Androgen Receptor Axis Targeted Therapy (ARAT) and availability of RNAseq profiling performed by a CLIA-certified lab using primary prostate biopsies collected before treatment. DEseq2 package was used to identify differentially expressed genes in PSA-H versus PSA-L cohorts. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) was used to identify pathways enriched in each cohort. All analyses were done using R v4.2.

Results

Eligible pts= 33 (11 PSA-H, 22 PSA-L) had a median age 65 years, median baseline PSA of 23.3 ng/ml, Gleason ≥8 ∼79%, de novo 55% and high-volume disease per CHAARTED criteria ∼52%. Pts with PSA-H had downregulation of the androgen response, estrogen response, and TNF-α signaling pathway, and upregulation of the interferon-alpha and coagulation pathway (Table). Table: 1413P

GSE Scores contrast PSA-H versus PSA-L

Pathway Normalized enrichment score (NES) P-value Q-values
TNFA_Signaling via_NFKB -2.04632 <<<0.001 <<<0.001
Androgen response -1.67726 <0.001 0.005
Estrogen response late -1.64446 <<0.001 0.001
Coagulation 1.560993 0.001 0.005
Interferon-alpha response 1.890529 <<0.001 0.001

Positive NES = upregulation in PSA-H pts, and negative NES = downregulation in PSA-H pts

Conclusions

mCSPC pts not achieving an optimal response to ADT-I have downregulated pre-treatment tumor AR signaling and TNF-α signaling and upregulation of inflammatory molecular pathways characterized by increased angiogenesis, adhesiveness, and invasiveness (PMIDs: 34696780, 12429291). After external validation, these data may provide upfront identification of patients who may not respond to intensified ADT, and aid with counselling, prognostication, and trial enrollment.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

E.J. Hernandez: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Fabric Genomics. M. Yandell: Financial Interests, Personal, Leadership Role: Backdrop Health, IDbyDNA. U. Swami: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Astellas; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: SeaGen, Exelixis; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Janssen, Exelixis; Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: Astellas/Seattle Genetics. B.L. Maughan: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Janssen Oncology, Exelixis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Bayer, AVEO, Clovis Oncology, Merck, Peloton Therapeutics, Pfizer, Bavarian Nordic, Astellas Medivation; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Tempus; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Clovis Oncology, Bristol Myers Squibb, Bavarian Nordic, Exelixis; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel Expenses: Exelixis. N. Agarwal: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Astellas, AstraZeneca, Aveo, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Calithera, Clovis, Eisai, Eli Lilly, EMD Serono, Exelixis, Foundation Medicine, Genentech, Gilead, Janssen, Merck, MEI Pharma, Nektar, Novartis, Pfizer, Pharmacyclics, and Seattle Genetics; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bavarian Nordic, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Calithera, Celldex, Clovis, Eisai, Eli Lilly, EMD Serono, Exelixis, Genentech, Gilead, Glaxo Smith Kline, Immunomedics, Janssen, Medivation, Merck, Nektar, New Link Genetics, Novartis,. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.